Thread View: vmsnet.mail.mx
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by daveh
Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:55
SMTP Server error status=20EC
Author: daveh
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:55
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:55
31 lines
1757 bytes
1757 bytes
Hi,
We hit a problem with the MX SMTP Server today. It received a message with an
invalid address from our campus mailer, and instead of aborting the message in a
tidy way it just rejected the message with status 20EC. This left the mailer
thinking that the message had not been sent, so it requeued the message and
tried to send it again 15 minutes later, when the same thing happened on the
VAX.
This is a portion of the SMTP Server log file:
STM[4]: Receive "MAIL FROM:<@jnt.ac.uk,@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+
STM[4]: Send "501 Invalid address: <@jnt.ac.uk,@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.a
STM[4]: Error: status=20EC
We are running MX 3.1C and VMS V5.5-1.
Is this a known error, and if so is there a patch for it?
Thanks in advance,
Dave
--
David Hastings | "The technical axiom that nothing is
VAX Systems Programmer | impossible sinisterly conditions one to
Oxford University Computing Services| the pitfall corollary that nothing is
daveh@vax.oxford.ac.uk | ridiculous"
Re: SMTP Server error status=20EC
Author: Carl J Lydick
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 10:28
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 10:28
29 lines
2452 bytes
2452 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.145527.11506@vax.oxford.ac.uk>, daveh@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes: =We hit a problem with the MX SMTP Server today. It received a message with an =invalid address from our campus mailer, and instead of aborting the message in a =tidy way it just rejected the message with status 20EC. This left the mailer =thinking that the message had not been sent, so it requeued the message and =tried to send it again 15 minutes later, when the same thing happened on the =VAX. = =This is a portion of the SMTP Server log file: = =STM[4]: Receive "MAIL FROM:<@jnt.ac.uk,@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+ =STM[4]: Send "501 Invalid address: <@jnt.ac.uk,@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk, @[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk, @[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.ac.uk,@[+JANET.JNT],@gec-b.rutherford.a =STM[4]: Error: status=20EC Now, wait a minute. The SMTP Server process only deals with INCOMING mail. If the same thing happened 15 minutes later, it means the SENDING machine is screwed up. Your machine complained of an invalid address, but the remote machine insisted on retrying the mail. Could you clarify your claim? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads