Article View: vmsnet.mail.pmdf
Article #655RE: default routing in Jnet V3.6
From: Kevin V. Carosso
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 04:57
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 04:57
14 lines
1340 bytes
1340 bytes
> I just upgraded to Jnet V3.6. However, before I institute the new default > routing can anyone tell me what its effects on BN_MASTER are? If I tell TOWSON2 > that the default Jnet router is TOWSON1 and then bring up Jnet on TOWSON2 > without a JANROUTES.JCP file, what happens when PMDF tries to process a message > destined for BN_MASTER on TOWSON2? Depends a bit on what Jnet default routes mean. If it is purely a Jnet issue and has nothing to do with mail, then PMDF won't know or care anything about Jnet default routes. I suspect this is the case. /Kevin Carosso Innosoft
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01GS8Q4STJKO8WXAFR@SUMMER.INNOSOFT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!mccall!ipmdf-newsgate!listShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!mccall!ipmdf-newsgate!list Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.pmdf Subject: RE: default routing in Jnet V3.6 Message-ID: <01GS8Q4STJKO8WXAFR@SUMMER.INNOSOFT.COM> From: "Kevin V. Carosso" <kvc@summer.innosoft.com> Date: 12 Dec 1992 20:57:48 -0800 (PST) Organization: The Internet Return-Path: <epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU> Resent-Date: 12 Dec 1992 20:57:48 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU Errors-To: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU Resent-Message-ID: <01GSBGJ369LU8ZL6Z8@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU> X-Vms-To: IN%"Dan@TOE.TOWSON.EDU" X-Vms-Cc: info-pmdf Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Lines: 15