🚀 go-pugleaf

Is the below a configuration problem? Or am I missing some
subtle logic?



>		The first of the two attached messages shows what I put
>in the To: and CC: fields when I sent it and is the copy that went to the
>second entry in the CC: field. The second attached message is the copy
>that went to the first entry in the CC: field. Note that its To: field is
>empty, whereas it should be EMPTY, and the CC: field is incomplete. I
>think PMDF must be garbling the header.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________
>From:	MSCF::PRING        15-DEC-1992 15:59:34.04
>To:	EMPTY
>CC:	IN%"Pring@mscf.med", PRING
>Subj:	delete me
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________________
>From:	IN%"PRING@mscf.med.upenn.edu" 15-DEC-1992 15:59:42.96
>To:
>CC:	IN%"Pring@mscf.med.upenn.edu"
>Subj:	delete me
>
>Return-path: <PRING@mscf.med.upenn.edu>
>Received: from mscf.med.upenn.edu by mscf.med.upenn.edu (PMDF #12721) id
> <01GSCML1ZIDS0008US@mscf.med.upenn.edu>; Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:59 EST
>Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:59 EST
>From: PRING@mscf.med.upenn.edu
>Subject: delete me
>Cc: Pring@mscf.med.upenn.edu
>Message-id: <01GSCML1ZIDS0008US@mscf.med.upenn.edu>
>X-VMS-To: EMPTY
>X-VMS-Cc: IN%"Pring@mscf.med", PRING
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________




	Karen Byrd, VAX Sys. Manager
	University of Pennsylvania
	Medical School Computer Facility
	Philadelphia, PA 19104 (USA)
	Internet: byrd@mscf.med.upenn.edu