Article View: vmsnet.misc
Article #124Two SCSI busses needed?
From: bleau
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 19:19
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 19:19
44 lines
2629 bytes
2629 bytes
I'm planning a purchase of a VAXstation 4000 model 90, and I'm considering putting a 2nd SCSI adapter on its TurboChannel. I'd like some feedback on the wisdom and justifiabiliy of this approach. My reasoning so far has been that I can foresee, within the next year, placing external 4 SCSI devices externl to the system, which will already have the internal RZ25 disk and a CD-ROM, making 7 SCSI units in use (including the cpu), out of 8. The additional devices would be a high-speed 1.7GB disk, a rewritable optical drive whose media is likely be mounted /SYSTEM and accessed by all, a 6250bpi tape drive, and an 8mm tape drive (5GB capacity) used to import daat (weekly) and to back up the entire cluster's disks (5GB worth) on a daily basis. Question #1: Is a 2nd SCSI adapter the only (best? least expensive?) way of making an additional set of units available? Another, somewhat realted question, is about the bus load and how it may be balanced. Assume a moderate to heavy i/o use on this workstation: data frequently being transferred between disk, optical, and tape, as well the probability that this will be the boot node in a VMScluster. Question #2: Could the SCSI bus turn into a bottleneck for even a workstation as powerful as the VS4000 model 90 and impair its effective use? If so, how likely is that, and how much of an impairment do you foresee? Separating the devices amoung two SCSIs would only partially help, by the way, since (and you can correct me on this, as I'm guessing) one of the SCSI's would be internal devices only and the other would be external devices. This would split off the system disk traffic (CD-ROM is negligable for now) from the rest of the i/o, but would leave big hitters on the external SCSI (big disk, two tapes, optical). Question #3: How much of an i/o load reduction in this type of configuration would adding another SCSI adapter be? Would the remaining devices on the external SCSI still present enough of an i/o load that they would interfere with one another and with user programs? You can email to me directly at bleau@umdsp.umd.edu and I will summarize and report in about a week. Thanks. Larry Bleau University of Maryland bleau@umdsp.umd.edu 301-405-6223
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15074@umd5.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!umd5!umdsp.umd.edu!BLEAUShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!umd5!umdsp.umd.edu!BLEAU From: bleau@umdsp.umd.edu Newsgroups: vmsnet.misc Subject: Two SCSI busses needed? Message-ID: <15074@umd5.umd.edu> Date: 20 Aug 92 19:19:02 GMT Sender: news@umd5.umd.edu Reply-To: bleau@umdsp.umd.edu Organization: University of Maryland Physics Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 44