Article View: vmsnet.misc
Article #77Re: ISVNET newsgroups are available...
From: Dick Munroe
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 14:32
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 14:32
46 lines
3044 bytes
3044 bytes
In article <19AUG199202303735@spades.aces.com>, gavron@spades.aces.com (Ehud Gavron 602-570-2000 x. 2546) writes: > > Dick said something about "Get Connected" even though he isn't. As usual, everything is true only by Ehud's definitions. DMConnection IS connected, with UUCP and all our clients ARE connected also. They just aren't DIRECTLY connected. For the VAST majority of applications direct connections aren't needed since "real time" response isn't (in general) a requirement. In any event [adequate] real time response can't be achieved over a WAN. Which bring me to the real crux of the matter: money. Considering the difference in price for an internet connection versus a UUCP connection most people who actually pay the bills (instead of simply using or managing connections) have to ask "What do I [my group, my company, ...] have to say that MUST be heard within 1-2 hours all over the world?" If the answer is nothing then UUCP is a MORE than adequate solution. If the answer is not much then UUCP is still probably the right answer. If the answer is "it depends" remember the telephone system, drop a dime instead of sending a mail message (or do both). If the answer is everything then purchase an internet connection and get it over with. But in all cases, match the solution to the problem! The internet isn't THE answer, it's just AN answer. Regarding Ehud's assertion about price comparison's between UUNET and DMConnection: if you examine the UUCP rate structures for both companies you will find that DMConnection is consistently less expensive, generally by a factor of 4 or more for low to moderate usage clients (This is especially true taking into account that DMConnection doesn't load our clients with a monthly fee that contains no communications costs.) Once usage gets above 8 hours/month DMConnection is still less expensive, but savings depend pretty dramatically on the volume of data. Of course, this isn't true for TCP/IP access to UUNET (last figures I have for them state $19/month, presumably with an additional $36/month for their carrying costs; I couldn't tell from their brochure) but then DMConnection isn't DIRECTLY connected [yet] so we can't offer that service. Once we are, we will provide equivalent access at competitive prices. -- Dick Munroe Internet: munroe@dmc.com Doyle Munroe Consultants, Inc. UUCP: ...uunet!thehulk!munroe 267 Cox St. Office: (508) 568-1618 Hudson, Ma. FAX: (508) 562-1133 GET CONNECTED!!! Send mail to info@dmc.com to find out about DMConnection.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug26.103244.4472@dmc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dmc.com!munroeReferences:
<1992Aug7.190829.4403@dmc.com> <9AUG199211530719@spades.aces.com> <1992Aug18.092448@mccall.com> <19AUG199202303735@spades.aces.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dmc.com!munroe From: munroe@dmc.com (Dick Munroe) Newsgroups: vmsnet.misc Subject: Re: ISVNET newsgroups are available... Message-ID: <1992Aug26.103244.4472@dmc.com> Date: 26 Aug 92 10:32:44 EDT References: <1992Aug7.190829.4403@dmc.com> <9AUG199211530719@spades.aces.com> <1992Aug18.092448@mccall.com> <19AUG199202303735@spades.aces.com> Organization: Doyle, Munroe Consultants, Inc., Hudson, MA Lines: 46