Thread View: vmsnet.pdp-11
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Jeffrey Luszcz
Wed, 06 Jan 1993 03:56
Whats the difference among SMD drives?
Author: Jeffrey Luszcz
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 03:56
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 03:56
8 lines
772 bytes
772 bytes
I've seen many SMD drive for sale on the net. Whats the difference between a SMD drive used on a SUN and a SMD drive used with a pdp? I would think it would be in the connector and cables...Iwould think the SUN types of connections would be wore modern and compact. -Jeff Luszcz
Re: Whats the difference among SMD drives?
Author: Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 08:39
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 08:39
37 lines
2467 bytes
2467 bytes
In article <1993Jan6.035634.14405@mail.cornell.edu>, jrl2@cornell.edu (Jeffrey Luszcz) writes: > I've seen many SMD drive for sale on the net. > Whats the difference between a SMD drive used > on a SUN and a SMD drive used with a pdp? > I would think it would be in the connector > and cables...Iwould think the SUN types of connections > would be wore modern and compact. SMD drives are SMD drives. Mostly. They all use a 60-pin common cable and a 26-pin radial cable. The signals on the cables are the read/write data, some state lines (like index) and a bus which is used for a variety of func- tions (like head select, cylinder select, etc), along with tag lines which identify which function is currently in progress on the bus lines. Early SMD drives were large floor-standing units (typified by the CDC 9766, also known as the DEC RM05). Newer units still used removable packs, but were smaller and rackmountable (like the Calcomp/Century Data Trident family). Finally SMD drives became sealed-media Winchester-type drives. The most-recently-produced units I know of are the CDC 9720 family, which come in sizes up to 1.8Gb (unformatted). Two of these fit side in 1 19" rack. The main difference between the old drives and the new ones (in terms of the interface) is the data rate. Obviously the newer drives pack more bits per revolution, so the data rate is higher (since lowering the speed of ro- tation isn't productive). There is also extended cylinder addressing to allow for more cylinders, and extra tag functions for new commands related to error recovery, etc. Most controller/drive combos will ignore any tags the counterpart doesn't support. So, provided your controller can support a data rate higher than or equal to that of a drive you want to connect, it should work. I've seen 9766's on some pretty new controllers (ever see a 9766 known as DUA0:? 8-). Terry Kennedy Operations Manager, Academic Computing terry@spcvxa.bitnet St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA terry@spcvxa.spc.edu +1 201 915 9381
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads