🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Jeffrey Luszcz Wed, 06 Jan 1993 03:56
Whats the difference among SMD drives?
#265
Author: Jeffrey Luszcz
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 03:56
8 lines
772 bytes
  I've seen many SMD drive for sale on the net.
Whats the difference between a SMD drive used
on a SUN and a SMD drive used with a pdp?
  I would think it would be in the connector
and cables...Iwould think the SUN types of connections
would be wore modern and compact.
   -Jeff Luszcz
Re: Whats the difference among SMD drives?
#267
Author: Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 08:39
37 lines
2467 bytes
In article <1993Jan6.035634.14405@mail.cornell.edu>, jrl2@cornell.edu (Jeffrey Luszcz) writes:
>   I've seen many SMD drive for sale on the net.
> Whats the difference between a SMD drive used
> on a SUN and a SMD drive used with a pdp?
>   I would think it would be in the connector
> and cables...Iwould think the SUN types of connections
> would be wore modern and compact.

  SMD drives are SMD drives. Mostly. They all use a 60-pin common cable and
a 26-pin radial cable. The signals on the cables are the read/write data,
some state lines (like index) and a bus which is used for a variety of func-
tions (like head select, cylinder select, etc), along with tag lines which
identify which function is currently in progress on the bus lines.

  Early SMD drives were large floor-standing units (typified by the CDC
9766, also known as the DEC RM05). Newer units still used removable packs,
but were smaller and rackmountable (like the Calcomp/Century Data Trident
family). Finally SMD drives became sealed-media Winchester-type drives.
The most-recently-produced units I know of are the CDC 9720 family, which
come in sizes up to 1.8Gb (unformatted). Two of these fit side in 1 19"
rack.

  The main difference between the old drives and the new ones (in terms of
the interface) is the data rate. Obviously the newer drives pack more bits
per revolution, so the data rate is higher (since lowering the speed of ro-
tation isn't productive). There is also extended cylinder addressing to
allow for more cylinders, and extra tag functions for new commands related
to error recovery, etc. Most controller/drive combos will ignore any tags
the counterpart doesn't support.

  So, provided your controller can support a data rate higher than or equal
to that of a drive you want to connect, it should work. I've seen 9766's
on some pretty new controllers (ever see a 9766 known as DUA0:? 8-).

	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads