🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct15.112429.1010@beckman.com>, dsroberts@beckman.com writes:
> I've gotten lot's of responses saying that VIRTUALPAGECNT is probably the
> culprit.  I think I need to give more information :-)
> 
> I have a cluster with 6610, 6420 and 6410.  They use a common sysdump.dmp and
> uaf.  The 6610 and 6420 have idential virtualpagecnt (270144) and memory
> (262144 pages).  The 6610 has no problem reading the dump, the 6420 gets
> virtual memory exhausted using the same USERNAMES.  They have identical size
> pagefiles (and number of pagefiles).
> 
> I can try increasing virtualpagecnt, but then I would need to understand why it
> would work at the current level on the 6610.  Any further thoughts?
> 
Well, thanks to Aaron Leonard, who suggested what to look at when the problem
occurs.  Indeed, on the 6420 I use all of virtualpagecnt.  Now, with all the
mentioned things being equal, why does it work with the 6610?
-- 
   Don Roberts                   Internet:  don@beckman.com
   Beckman Instruments, Inc.     Phone:     714/961-3029
   2500 Harbor Bl. Mailstop X-12 FAX:       714/961-3351
   Fullerton, CA  92634          Disclaimer:  Blame me, not Beckman.
   So, how many hospitals HAVE been built by organizations of secular
   humanists and atheists, anyway?