🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: vmsnet.tpu
Article #136

Re: how compatible is DECset 11 LSE/SCA

#136
From: Terry Poot
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:00
91 lines
4892 bytes
In article <1993Jan11.182258.6008@e2big.mko.dec.com>, walsh@sparty.zko.dec.com
(Chris Walsh - DECset project lead writes:
>  Terry Poot (tp@mccall.com) raised several issues about DECset, and
>  particularly the LSE component, several days ago.  Let me try to respond to
>  them all (Terry, if I miss something please followup.)  Warning - this may
>be
>  a little lengthy.

Thank you!

>  The new document packaging has gotten some mixed reviews.  Some like it,
>some
>  don't.  I suspect that what you are missing is that the reference manuals
>are
>  included within the DECset images - there is a new set of savesets called
>  DECSETDOCS that contains the manuals you want.  

Great. Do I vmsinstal that or just unpack it? This stuff is on the CD, and I
just ran out the release notes with vmsinstal to review. I didn't catch the part
about the docs being separate, if it was in there.

>  Unfortunately, for various reasons I'd rather not go into, we do not have
>  bookreader format for these books.  

Is this a permanent situation? I'd _really_ prefer them to be on the doc CD's.

>The normal CD documentation distribution
>  requires bookreader format, so they could not be included there.  Faced with
>  not having the books available on-line, or putting them in our kits - we put
>  them in the kits.

Given you didn't have bookreader format, I think you made the right choice. But
again, I'd still prefer them on CD. Depending on how big they are, I may have to
print and then delete them, and I still won't have it on-line. I'll probably
print it anyway since there is so much new, so I do like having the option (one
of my gripes about bookreader, incidentally, is that I can't print that stuff).
What I'd really like, I guess, is both Bookreader and Postscript formats for
everything. I know I'm dreaming. :-)

>  You can install without breaking everything.  Installed correctly, LSE users
>  that use the system section file won't be able to tell the a new LSE has
>been
>  installed.  LSE users with customized section files will need to rebuild
>  them, as is true of every new release of LSE.

I don't mind rebuilding, I've got the source. As long as I don't have to rewrite
the source using the new command language, I'm happy.

>  LSE'S installation checks to see if there is a previously installed LSE.  If
>  there is one, it asks the installer if he/she wants the use the default
>  settings of the installed LSE.  If the installer says "yes" the user base
>  won't be able to tell there is a new LSE on the system except for rebuilding
>  their private section files which has always been the case for LSE.

Hmm. I must have neglected to read the installation guide, because I missed all
of that. Sorry.

>  Note carefully!  LSE V4.0 has two command languages on VMS.  The V3.1
>  compatable language and a "Portable Language" developed to be operating
>  system independent and portably implemented. (The V3.1 compatable language
>  depended on VMS)
>
>  Documentation for the V3.1 compatable language is no longer shipped. So if
>  you intend to continue to use it, save your manual(s).

Thanks for the warning. 

>      - A potential data corruption within very large CMS libraries.

Again, thanks for the warning. This one could have sunk us.

>>Comments on the debugger (I know I'm drifting off topic for this
>>group, but I thought I'd ask, since I'm here :-) ).
>
>  The debugger is essentially the same debugger coming out in new VMS
>releases.
>  It has a *much* improved graphical interface.  We included it on the DECset
>  kit as a "sneak preview", so that it would be available earlier than if it
>  waited for a VMS release.

I'm going to have to try out all this stuff in decwindows mode it seems. I long
ago just set it all up to mostly use decterms, especially the debugger.

Thanks very much for the authoritative answers! I really want to get my hands on
the new stuff, and now it looks like it'll be safe to install it (after reading
the release notes, installation guides, and reference manuals, of course). 
--
Terry Poot <tp@mccall.com>                   The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!rutgers!depot!mccall!tp)          615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in KS (913)776-4041           Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan12.140023@mccall.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!mccall!mccall!tp
References: <1993Jan5.112408@mccall.com> <1993Jan11.182258.6008@e2big.mko.dec.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!mccall!mccall!tp
Newsgroups: vmsnet.tpu
Subject: Re: how compatible is DECset 11 LSE/SCA
Message-ID: <1993Jan12.140023@mccall.com>
From: tp@mccall.com (Terry Poot)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:00:23 CST
Reply-To: tp@mccall.com (Terry Poot)
References: <1993Jan5.112408@mccall.com> <1993Jan11.182258.6008@e2big.mko.dec.com>
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-Host: mis1
Nntp-Posting-User: tp
Lines: 91