Is this concistent?

Article View: wa.general

Article #1095

#1095

From: Stephen X. Carter
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 07:16

12 lines
1369 bytes

John Howard has spoken out against a possible death penalty
for David Hicks (in detention in Guantanamo Bay) on the
grounds that Australia does not have the death penalty, yet
he (and Simon Crean) both supported the imposition of the
death penalty on Amrosi (sp?) in the Bali Bombing trial.

How can that make sense?  Either both are supported, or
neither are supported. 

-- 
steve@stephencarterNOSPAM.net
Nothing is Beatle Proof!!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3f334da7.32638583@localhost>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!In.nntp.be!/usr/lib/news!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!freenews.iinet.net.au!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1056b9,3defe081ab8b4105,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b9,public
X-Google-Thread: 105e39,3defe081ab8b4105,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid105e39,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-08 00:20:15 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!In.nntp.be!/usr/lib/news!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!freenews.iinet.net.au!not-for-mail
From: steve@[127.0.0.1] (Stephen  X. Carter)
Newsgroups: wa.general,iinet.general
Subject: Is this concistent?
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 07:16:43 GMT
Reply-To: bluemeanie@[127.0.0.1]
Message-ID: <3f334da7.32638583@localhost>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
X-NFilter: 1.2.0
Lines: 12
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.59.30.222
X-Trace: 1060327003 freenews.iinet.net.au 23601 203.59.30.222