🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:18:39 +1000, "dechucka" <vomit@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:t1p2u5tvti2ohpgu7t6i4o18na8qdddrag@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 05 May 2010 10:20:32 GMT, nospamplease@mo.com (nospamplease)
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I know friends that work for the Greens and they are not happy that
>>>the Greens are backing Rudd. Greens not thought this through at all.
>>>Still they won't matter now, Libs can block it with those two IND's
>>>and my greatest wish would be they block supply and force an early
>>>election before its to late.
>>>
>> Greens will always back a como like the Peking commo KRudd
>
>didn't on the ETS you moron 

The "Greens" always reject anything for the environment 
Rejecting the sale of Telstra and the billions it would of provided
for environment has result to the most harm done to the environment
EVER

petzl 
-- 
Australia has had enough. NO MORE MOSLEMS 
<http://www.cdp.org.au/docs/A5_Musilm_Poll_Flyer.pdf> 
Vote 
Christian Democrat first, 
The Opposition Member second 
Your sitting member last 
2nd last the anti-environment party the "Greens"