🚀 go-pugleaf

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote in message 
news:6i6b2nFp3lghU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
>
> "Stephen X. Carter" <steve@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message 
> news:48bdf334.596396@localhost...
>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 11:51:37 +1000, "Trevor Wilson" 
>> <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>>"Brad" <brad@someplace.com> wrote in message
>>>news:t87vk.33112$IK1.23177@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>> Are both these parties for or ahainst global warming?
>>>> I get the destict feeling that both parties are skeptical on global
>>>> warming.
>>>>
>>>> The Greens have a preference deal with the ALP WA which has to mean 
>>>> they
>>>> are for coal power. Just the other day they wanted solar only.
>>>
>>>**Bullshit. Read their policy statement. You've been told this before, so 
>>>I
>>>can only assume that you are a complete moron.
>>
>> As a public service, from <http://www.wa.greens.org.au/policy/energy> 
>> here it is.  (It may be
>> good, it may be mad, etc - I make no comment other than to suggest to the 
>> Lib running dogs here
>> that they at least read it and comment on any facts from within that they 
>> are not happy about.
>> :-)
>
> **The babbling idiot, known as 'Brad' seems incapable of reading the 
> facts. It seems to concentrate on it's own delusion.

POT KETTLE BLACK.

We miners will hav eads in the West Australian Newspaper starting this 
Friday
going into Saturday news paper to put the GREENS LAST no matter who the 
public
bvote for. About time the GREENS disappear as they have no idea about 
anything at all.

Why would the Greens back coal power stations by giving the ALP its 
prefferences.
The Libs are wanting to go GAS power which uses 50% less carbon than coal.

Why would anyone block uranium to China and India for nuclear power 
stations.
The Greens must be in denial at what is the cause of greenhouse gas.