🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:29:13 +0800, tony@altavista.com wrote:

>On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:15:24 +0800, "Sandgroper"
><woodbudgie@KNICKERSgmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Brad" <brad@someplace.com> wrote in message 
>>news:HOKuk.32868$IK1.9097@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>> Mr Carpenter has an ad campaign claiming that Radio active Uranium Ore 
>>> will be going past schools to the freo port.
>>> What a load of rot. Any ore out of the Kimberly which is where the Uranium 
>>> is goes to a Kimberley Port where there
>>> are rail lines. Uranium Ore is not radio active. If it was there would be 
>>> thousands of dead workers which handle the
>>> ore by hand every day of the week.
>>
>>Bullshit , uranium ore does have low levels of radiation in it's natural 
>>state (U235 & U238 ) and it is refined into yellow cake that has a higher 
>>concentration of radioactive elements.
>>Also Yellow Cake if fairly toxic to people , it is a heavy metal , just like 
>>mercury and lead.
>>
>>Why don't you get your facts straight , I bet you don't even live in WA , 
>>and have no idea where are the iron ore ports are located , not to mention 
>>the fact that the rail lines from the iron ore depostis to the ports are 
>>PRIVATELY OWNED , so you will have quite a problem trying to get access to 
>>those rail lines as was the case recently .
>>
>>>
>>> Nuclear Waste is a by product from nuclear reactors.
>>> I cannot believe the media in WA not looking at these false ads at all.
>>> People are believing it in the masses.
>>
>>Then the media should also be looking at the false and deceptive adverts 
>>that Barnett  is using.
>>
>>>
>>> WA has to be the worst educated state in Australia. People are believing 
>>> that
>>> uranium ore is radio active because the premier is saying that.
>>
>>Physics is not one of your strong points is it ? , perhaps you missed those 
>>classes and opted to go and get pissed out of your tiny brain at all those 
>>Young Liberal parties , I have heard all about them from other sources than 
>>the media.
>
>Physics ?? I would have thought that this would come under
>Chemistry....

Yikes.

You're even more ignorant that I had previously thought.

The study of radioactivity is as close to pure physics as it gets.

-- 
steve.hat.stephencarter.not.com.but.net
Nothing is Beatle Proof!!