🚀 go-pugleaf

Labour loons have always had very low IQs. Look at Fakey and Peter
Peewee Wicks for instance.

On Sep 2, 6:51 pm, "Brad" <b...@someplace.com> wrote:
> Are both these parties for or ahainst global warming?
> I get the destict feeling that both parties are skeptical on global warming.
>
> The Greens have a preference deal with the ALP WA which has to mean they
> are for coal power. Just the other day they wanted solar only. The Greens as
> stupid
> as that other party of the democrats which are thankfully no more.
>
> Who on earth would anyone block uranium to China. The only way they'll get
> the greehouse
> down to by going nuclear energy. Bob Carr former NSW Premier goes further
> and thinks
> Australia should be powered by nuclear energy. His comments were in todays
> West Australian
> News Paper.
>
> Carpenter at odds with the South Aust premier and the NT as they have both
> been exporting uranium
> through their own captial cities for the past 40 yeears and no problems what
> so ever.
>
> Lead on the other hand is a problem, just ask the people of Esperance where
> another
> cover up has taken place. Wildlife all dead which includes birds and fish.
> First they thought
> bird flu wa in the area due to all the dead burds. Now it turns out lead
> poising in the area
> thanks to the WA ALP Government who were to lax with all of this.
>
> Carpenter is building two new coal power stations in collie with another 3
> on the drawing boards.
> Are they that dumb and have no idea what is going on in the real world. If
> they want carbon credits
> they can build coal if they want to and sell uranium to China who are rthe
> biggest emitters of
> greenhouse on the planet but we West Aussies are the biggest per capita
> which is embarassing to say the least.
>
> About time the Libs started gettig stuck into all this nonsense with the ALP
> making more pollution not less.
> LIBS are greener than the ALP will ever wish to be an dthe greens are plainm
> stupid. Has anyone not told them that solar
> panels cost 8 times more than coal. At this stage of their development they
> are not the answer, maybe in 50 years
> they maybe but not now. Humans can't wait 50 years, hell we can't wait until
> 2010, we must act now.
>
> Most countries are going nuclear because its the only one that is zero
> emmissions.
> What people forget about solar os that there a re not the panels or the
> materials available
> for even 5% of the population in the world to go solar. The planet simply
> doesn't have
> the materials to do that. Wher nuclear energy not that much ore is required
> for nuclear power
> and the waste per million people is only 2.5KG with a half life of 20 years.
> These lsatest reactors
> burn nuclear waste down by 10000 to 1. So 10000kg becomes only 1kg of waste.
> Has to be the way to go.
>
> The Chinese are leading the way forward with pebble nuclear reactors which
> don't even need heavy water
> unlike the old ones. Go to the ABC.net.au catalist web site on pebble
> nuclear reactors, all there for all to see
> or do a google search.