🚀 go-pugleaf

"Little Johnny Howard" <pmjwhoward@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Clueless Commie deadbeat Fran wrote:
>> On Oct 29, 3:18 am, tim <t...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> > Watched Costello last week on the 7-30 report. Carried himself very
>> > well.
>> >
>> > I thought there was going to be a debate with Costello and Swan on
>> > Sunday night but nothing on the ABC or any other channel. How
>> > disappointing.
>> >
>> > I think if Costello had a debate with Rudd, Costello would easily beat
>> > Rudd in any debate.
>> >
>>
>> Personally, I doubt it. Rudd could simply invite Costello to develop
>> his ideas on why the banks have no business putting up rates. If Swan
>> has half a brain, he'll ask Costello that. There's no answer Costello
>> can give to that which doesn't make him look less credible.
>
> Are you an idiot, Flan? The banks have no business putting up rates
> because its not their prerogative. Its the role of the Reserve Bank.

The banks can do what they like. They aren't run by the government. Costello 
only thinks he can tell them what to do, which just goes to show how power has 
gone to his head.

>> I believe a more interesting debate would be between either John
>> Howard or Peter Costello and Malcolm Turnbull to see who should get
>> the job of leading the Liberal Party on the other side of the
>> election.
>>
>> Maybe all three coul make their pitch -- Howard for 18 months,
>> Costello and Turnbull for three years.
>
> Maybe you could get a clue.

Pardon?