Re: Is it to late to change to Costello or even Turnball ?

Article View: wa.general

Article #418

#418

From: Fran
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:01

26 lines
2450 bytes

On Oct 29, 3:18 am, tim <t...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Watched Costello last week on the 7-30 report. Carried himself very
> well.
>
> I thought there was going to be a debate with Costello and Swan on
> Sunday night but nothing on the ABC or any other channel. How
> disappointing.
>
> I think if Costello had a debate with Rudd, Costello would easily beat
> Rudd in any debate.
>

Personally, I doubt it. Rudd could simply invite Costello to develop
his ideas on why the banks have no business putting up rates. If Swan
has half a brain, he'll ask Costello that. There's no answer Costello
can give to that which doesn't make him look less credible.

I believe a more interesting debate would be between either John
Howard or Peter Costello and Malcolm Turnbull to see who should get
the job of leading the Liberal Party on the other side of the
election.

Maybe all three coul make their pitch -- Howard for 18 months,
Costello and Turnbull for three years.

Fran

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1193616109.561884.310410@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References: <2oc9i314d15jo74ifj1jn702fa229r5r39@4ax.com> <B78Vi.24171$tp3.111302@nasal.pacific.net.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1056b9,c52d4de4dd4ff9ac
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,c52d4de4dd4ff9ac
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,c52d4de4dd4ff9ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b9,gid1083c4,gid10df0c,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  Fran <Fran.Beta@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: wa.general,aus.general,aus.politics
Subject: Re: Is it to late to change to Costello or even Turnball ?
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:01:49 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <1193616109.561884.310410@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
References: <2oc9i314d15jo74ifj1jn702fa229r5r39@4ax.com>
   <B78Vi.24171$tp3.111302@nasal.pacific.net.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.88.131.149
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1193616113 19492 127.0.0.1 (29 Oct 2007 00:01:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:01:53 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <B78Vi.24171$tp3.111302@nasal.pacific.net.au>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 itcpx04 (NetCache NetApp/6.0.5), 1.0 ISA08
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=61.88.131.149;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0

Reply to Parent Message