Article View: wa.general
Article #487Re: Uncontrolled temper
From: The Raven
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 09:38
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 09:38
165 lines
7344 bytes
7344 bytes
"Josip Kolar" <josip96@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message news:aq2aes$5mq7r$1@ID-89636.news.dfncis.de... > > "jg" <jgaunt@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:loYw9.67915$g9.191909@newsfeeds.bigpond.com... > > > > "Josip Kolar" <josip96@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message > > news:aq0ilb$5fi5t$1@ID-89636.news.dfncis.de... > > > Today, Saturday 2.11.2002, happened something very odd to me. > > > It was a sunny afternoon in Mirrabooka, at about 16:30. > > > I drove from Mirrabooka Square onto Yirrigan Drive towards Alexander > > Drive, > > > and was going to turn right into Dianella Drive slowing down gradually > to > > 20 > > > km/h and even slower, although there was green right arrow. Behind me > was > > a > > .................. > > Maybe the policeman was rude/rough, but you were driving dangerously and > > your daughter was behaving in an insulting manner and illegally nursing a > > child - you probably looked for all the world like just another shithead > > with an attitude. Why doesn't she know what to do when you have a turn? > Why > > is she more concerned with being rude to other drivers? If you were > > hypoglycemic you would have a fairly short time before passing out from > lack > > of sugar, but to be creeping home sick @ 20kph you were probably > > hyperglycemic and are not insulin-dependent (otherwise you could have > > insulin to lower the sugar level). If this happens often your > > diet/insulin/exercise is not in balance and you need to see a doctor - do > > this before you worry about any police brutality or conspiracy theories. > You > > are going to kill yourself or someone else before the "baddies" get you. > > > > > > Thanks mate, well spoken. Actually, too well for my understanding. > I have survived that, and many other, "police brutality" and/or "conspiracy > theories". Sounds more like you don't know how to drive. > You haven't, that's for sure; you do not know how the things are in reality. The reality is that you can't face what a shocking danger you are on the roads. > You know, if you do, how the things should be. > See, everyone is different; some claim that every person is the same. > At least, I AM different; so the things are different with me and thus > uncomprehensive to some. Obviously. You're logic is incomprehensible. > > Regardless of green lights, I believe that is my right to stop when I see > fit. Wrong! > Not at someone else's command, be it even a commissioner of the police. Wrong! > As far I understand the rules, one must not drive, or go, trough red light. Wrong! > And even this is questionable and depends on circumstances. Wrong! > And for a green arrow... I was braking for more than fifty metres before > sopping. What the hell for, you were under 20KPH? Are you that incapable of controlling a car? > Only a troll would not see glowing braking lights on my car and slam into > me. Are you really that stupid? Go check the statistics for rear end accidents.............. > > But the story I presented is not complete; I presented only a part that I > think is more important. The bit about you being a menace on our roads. > I was slowing for two reasons at the same time, of which none occurred to > the policeman. > Other reason is that towards me was driving another troll with full speed > and stopped at the very last second. And by your own words " presented only a part that I think is more important." Don't you think that's important that another car was approaching, you didn't think so in your original post. Sounds like you usually just wander on down the road with no consideration for other traffic. > That's why I was not sure and finally stopped; and continued to drive when > the other driver stopped. One of these paranoid hesistators, I see. > Would you exercise your right and drive, trusting the green arrow? No, I drive like you. I flip a coin and then decide to either proceed or jump on my brakes...................... <sarcasm in case you missed it> > In my opinion I was wrong because of my being too cautious. You admit fault once again. It is often more dangerous to be overly cautious than to open your eyes and engage your brain and figure out how not to be a road hazard to both yourselves and others. > > And as for my medical condition, I know better than anyone else how to > control it. But you admit to not controlling it........very reassuring. The fact you use that as an excuse is appalling. > It is not so bad, but only when it comes I am more cautious and would stop > the vehicle rather than chance. And by stopping and being unnecessarily cautious you create a greater risk for all nearby road users. Be cautious, but not to the point of causing greater risk to everyone else. If you don't consider other road users you are going to directly or indirectly kill/injure someone. > I am in possession of heavy vehicle drivers licence with clean past. Now you are scaring us. Give it up, you'll kill someone sooner or later. The fact you haven't killed anyone yet isn't a valid excuse. > But now, in a tiny Hyundai, I am very bad driver. I really can't believe how stupid you are. You've admitted to doing wrong, having no idea how to drive, can't control your medical condition, admit to being constantly pulled over by police for bad driving, drive an unroadworthy vehicle, and somehow believe you can justify yourself. Now you tell us you have a heavy endorsement. I look forward to hearing about your crash on the news, hopefully without injuring/killing anyone else. > Yes, my daughter should not to put a finger up, I agree. What about the baby on her lap, let alone getting into an unroadworthy car being driven by someone who's hopeless? Oh, I guess that's OK becuase you are victimised by police and hold a heavy endorsement................. -- The Raven ** Undisputed President of the ozemail.* NG's ** since August 15th 2000. ** Conqueror of the uunet.* NG's
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<aq2qt3$5phlt$1@ID-137622.news.dfncis.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!1cust35.tnt5.mel1.da.uu.NET!not-for-mailReferences:
<aq0ilb$5fi5t$1@ID-89636.news.dfncis.de> <loYw9.67915$g9.191909@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <aq2aes$5mq7r$1@ID-89636.news.dfncis.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1056b9,6b776a80c9bfd386 X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b9,public X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,6b776a80c9bfd386 X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public X-Google-Thread: f757b,6b776a80c9bfd386 X-Google-Attributes: gidf757b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-03 01:39:51 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!1cust35.tnt5.mel1.da.uu.NET!not-for-mail From: "The Raven" <wsmc@flashmail.com> Newsgroups: wa.general,aus.general,aus.transport Subject: Re: Uncontrolled temper Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:38:25 +1100 Organization: Nevermore Lines: 167 Message-ID: <aq2qt3$5phlt$1@ID-137622.news.dfncis.de> References: <aq0ilb$5fi5t$1@ID-89636.news.dfncis.de> <loYw9.67915$g9.191909@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <aq2aes$5mq7r$1@ID-89636.news.dfncis.de> Reply-To: "The Raven" <wsmc@flashmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust35.tnt5.mel1.da.uu.net (63.34.218.35) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1036316389 6080189 63.34.218.35 (16 [137622]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106