🚀 go-pugleaf

Dean Hollister <dean@mushka.cx> wrote in message
news:381bd7d3.0@news.wa.apana.org.au...
> "Death" <somewhere@other.than.here> writes:
>
> >What joke, it's broke we agreed on that, but what your saying
> >is that we must pick a new model no matter what. Surely,
> >there is a chance that you will create another broke system.
> >Now, if you really feel that it is important that the system
> >works, that all the checks and balances are in place then
> >all well and good. I have yet to see a 'Yes' republician
> >answer clearly and distinctly any of the concerns brought
> >up by 'No' Republicians. So please prove to me that
> >the checks and balances exist in the new system...
>
> Such as? Examples?
>
> Well the Westminster system is just as flawed as the current model on
> offer. How many states had 'elected' dictatorships? WA was one.

This a joke right, the old systems is bad, the new system is
almost like the old system with all it's flaws, so we should
move to the new one anyway. Mmmm, have you got someone
stuckup your arse, you don't play around with a constitution
with second or third best, you work for 'quality'.
>
> Hey, but I've yet to see a 'Monarchist' clearly and distinctly answer any
> questions about the anomalies in the current system.

We can knock the current system, that's probably
what led to the current debate, but alas you can't see
that debate has been won, we have a referendum.

I'm however not interested in 'the proposed change that isn't a change'
nonsense of the 'Yes' lobby. You know their hiding something when
they say 'sign here it's just a formality'.

>
> Regards,
>
> d.