🚀 go-pugleaf

Dean Hollister <dean@mushka.cx> wrote in message
news:3819bc4e.0@news.wa.apana.org.au...
> "Power Mad" <news@ten.com> writes:
>
> >How about that Darryl Melham.  Reckons if you want to register a protest
> >vote you should vote Yes for the republic and No for the preamble.  No
> >analysis of the wording or justification vor voting No other than to give
> >the Government a kick in the shins.  What a dick head.
>
> My vote has nothing to do with protesting. I'm all for the republic, but
> I'm not in favour of the wording of that preamble, in particular, the
> first two words of it.

Yes, they suck. But, just for interest why would you vote
against the a preamble defined by a fucking bunch of lame
christians but vote for the republic that allows a 2/3 majority
of lame Christians a say so in the President.

The GG is the proxy of the Queen, the president will be the proxy
of two-thirds of parliment, the Queen is notoriously impartial
the parliment is not. At least with a directly elected president
the will of the majority, anyone could win, you almost guarenteed
in the 'politicians' republic however of getting a arse kissing christian.

Are you really an atheist? At least in the present system we did
get an atheist as GG, because the PM couldn't care or didn't care.



>
> Regards,
>
> d.