Article View: wi.general
Article #210Re: The Ken Pangborn Challenge
From: Ken
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:15
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:15
78 lines
5126 bytes
5126 bytes
"Father's Rights" <fathers-rights@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:6MOE2CPZ37389.2421296296@frog.gilgamesh.org...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> "Ben" <benesh@nospam.new.rr.com> wrote:
> >Does the name David Moore come in the picture any more??? Last I heard a
man
> >by that name has been using Pangborns name for everything and it has not
> >been the actual Ken Pangborn.
>
> I'm the person you're talking about, and, no, I have never "used
Pangborn's
> name" for anything....although he makes that allegation on a daily basis.
> In four years, though, he has yet to back this or any of his other
> allegations up with facts. See the http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
website
> for plenty of examples of threats, racist postings and criminal activity
> which trace directly back to accounts owned by Ken.
No Davey they trace to YOUR forgeries of things to me. And to people who
don't exist but are you ALIASES.
Youy keep claiming that all this shit traces to me but when anyone INCLUDING
ONE OF YOUR FORMER ISP's
checks, they almost NEVER DO! You are a DISHONORABLE lying sack of shit!
> > That's the way it is since I have had
> >personal E-mail conversations with him and he seems like an everyday nice
> >citizen.
> That's nice. During the next "conversation", ask him to provide proof for
> his numerous claims. Then watch the bullshit unfold.
What claims David? The ones I actually amdew which HAVE been repeatedly
proven over and over again not only by m,e but many others. Ands when they
do, you emerely accuse them of being me or Keith or a "MINDLESS SOCKPUPPET"
and you claim nothing was proven. One can replay on Google your WHINING and
feeble attempts to explain away why your discharge from the Mariens made you
"INELLIGIBLE" to reenlist although your MOS was a "SUPER CITITICAL"
specialty to which the Marines were paying a $25,000 to $35,000
re-enlistment bonus to DESIREABLE members. You whines all over the place
about your re-enlistment code. As you SCREAM that NOBODY has seen your
discharge info, you also SCREAM that I posted your service number after you
challenged me to PROVE that I saw your SORRY ASSED service record. Oh boy
did you WHINE in soc.vetarans. In fact you whine about it on your web page.
You asked for it. It was YOUR standard of proof Davey. But then you have
been a whining sissyboy all your life. How you got into the Corps is
something I will never understand. How you made it though basic staggers the
imagination. And when Keith and MANY oters discussed your reenlistment
code.. You TRIED to explain it away Davey. What does one have to prove about
you? What they actually said or what YOU claim they said?
> >Also, if you are so sure that it really is him, then why must you
> >post anonymously? No one likes to listen to anonymous people.
> Forgive me, but Pangborn is currently posting to this and other groups
> under four different e-mail accounts, each of which he uses to lend
support
> to himself and each of which he denies is him. Isn't this a form of
> anonymity?
I am? That's news to me. YOU claim that I am. Your proof that I am; the
use of terms like "fruitloop" and "nut case" are ones MANY people apply to
you Moore. Because you ARE completely INSANE! You are a whack job! A
complete and total head case. You use ANONYMNOUS accounts because you arer a
COWARD and you know from your history that if you used a legit ISP account
to do what you do it'd vaporize in the first day. 100% of what you do on the
net, Moore is HARASSMENT and ABUSE. You have lost enough accounts to
establish that.
> Personally, I never post "anonymously". All of my posts are signed with
> PGP, thus proving that I'm the author. Do I route my posts through
> remailers? Yes, due to the harassment this individual has put my family
> through for the past four years.
BULLSHIT PGP proves NOTHING! Not a frigging thing Davey.
The ONLY person harassing your family is YOU!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<07ND8.5746$__.20145@news1.atlantic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news1.atlantic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<nwFD8.37784$X9.1381327@typhoon.kc.rr.com> <6MOE2CPZ37389.2421296296@frog.gilgamesh.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e835,3ec1bb835d83dde X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: fa03c,3ec1bb835d83dde X-Google-Attributes: gidfa03c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-13 04:42:25 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news1.atlantic.net!not-for-mail From: "Ken" <krp@atlantic.net> Newsgroups: wi.general,chi.general References: <nwFD8.37784$X9.1381327@typhoon.kc.rr.com> <6MOE2CPZ37389.2421296296@frog.gilgamesh.org> Subject: Re: The Ken Pangborn Challenge Lines: 82 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: <07ND8.5746$__.20145@news1.atlantic.net> Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 07:15:19 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.208.107.102 X-Complaints-To: news@atlantic.net X-Trace: news1.atlantic.net 1021287996 209.208.107.102 (Mon, 13 May 2002 07:06:36 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 07:06:36 EDT