🚀 go-pugleaf

Lou P. Garrew wrote:

> Uncle Schmuck trolled:
> 
>>Lou P. Garrew wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Gullible as ever,
>>>Uncle Schlemiel trolled:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Matt Telles wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>He wrote a question
>>
>>He's a fucking lying partisan birdbrain Lou, just like YOU.
> 
> 
> Once again you avoid the question he asked, and fail to admit you lied.
> Provide evidence that Kerry called the Army stupid. 

I never said that though did I you brain dead sack of shit!

I said Ken Dixon, and likely other soldiers felt that was his intention 
and they were displeased with it.

>>>>THE WASHINGTON TIMES
>>>
>>>
>>>Known as a neo-con source of disinformation.
>>
>>Not a factual rebuttal.
> 
> 
> Au contraire, it is both factual and a rebuttal.

No, it's neither, it falls under the heading of non sequitur unsupported 
resource demonizaton.

You need to learn how to sty on topic shit head.

>>>>    John A. Shaw, the deputy undersecretary of defense for
>>>>international technology security, said in an interview that he believes
>>>>the Russian troops, working with Iraqi intelligence, "almost certainly"
>>>>removed the high-explosive material that went missing from the Al-Qaqaa
>>>>facility, south of Baghdad.
>>>
>>>
>>>"He believes" and "almost certainly" -- in other words he has
>>>no convincing evidence, but he'll lie anyway.
>>
>>We already know what Russia had at stake there:
> 
> 
> By changing the subject 

Um the subject is what Russia sold Sod-em and wanted to hide.

You're not very good at this now are you son?

>>>>    "The Russians brought in, just before the war got started, a whole
>>>>series of military units," Mr. Shaw said.
>>>
>>>
>>>Which our intelligence services didn't notice until just now? What
>>>a crock.
>>
>>But a "crock" you're uanble to prove.
> 
> 
> No, YOU are the one who is required to prove your claim. I say that the
> claim
> is a clumsy lie 

Yet somehow you can not factually contradict it, save for your own 
dyspepsia.

>>They may have noticed some time prior to the war...
>>
>>http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/970152/posts
>>
>>U.S. intelligence suspects Iraq's weapons of mass destruction have
>>finally been located.
>>
>>Unfortunately, getting to them will be nearly impossible for the United
>>States and its allies, because the containers with the strategic
>>materials are not in Iraq.
>>
> 
> So you and your wingnut pals have targetted the next nation to invade?
> Who are you going to send? Got a spare army somewhere? Let you in on a 
> secret, dumbo: we're stretched thin in Iraq. 


Not "thin" but presently engaged at least.

No mater, they may have a change of heart like Ghadaffi did, you never know.

Seeing what happened to Sod-em and his kids might be a real wake up call.

>>>Ever try to shred a factory, a lab, ammo bunkers
>>
>>Can you read?
>>
>>What a moron.
> 
> 
> Yes

Yes, you're a weapons grade moron.

>>"evidence of any of the contractual arrangements"
>>
>>Contracts are generally executed on PAPER you brain stem!
> 
> 
> Hahahahaha! 

Um, seek help, you're balmy.

>>>>    Mr. Shaw, who was in charge of cataloging the tons of conventional
>>>>arms provided to Iraq by foreign suppliers, said he recently obtained
>>>>reliable information on the arms-dispersal program from two European
>>>>intelligence services that have detailed knowledge of the Russian-Iraqi
>>>>weapons collaboration.
>>>
>>>
>>>Oh, gawd,
>>
>>Still no factual rebuttal...
> 
> 
> And you still provide no evidence 

That's up to how much the Pentagon and CIA choose to share of their sat. 
imagery.

>>>>    Most of Saddam's most powerful arms were systematically separated
>>>
>>>>from other arms like mortars, bombs and rockets, and sent to Syria and
>>>
>>>>Lebanon, and possibly to Iran, he said.
>>>
>>>
>>>Get real. Saddam gave his WMDs to any of his mortal enemies?
>>
>>"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"...
>>
>>You're a very stupid person Lou, drop fucking dead!
>>
> 
> Aw, did I hurt the widdle boy's feelings, 

I don't know, were you abusing your child while you typed this?

-- 
��ࡱ�