🚀 go-pugleaf

On 8/19/2012 4:20 PM, ? wrote:

Munged the followups again like the little coward he is....


> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:00:55 -0600, "Pelican Pt."<san@dy.spit>  Spammy
> spewed forth once again:
>
>> On 8/19/2012 6:43 AM, ? wrote:
>
>>
>> That's a naked lie, Gunner always posts as "Gunner".
>>
> Bullshit spammy.

Fact.

Google can be your friend too you know...

>> You seem to have a projection problem here, "Claude Balls"...
>>
> So now I'm Claude again...LOL Whatever happened to Martin?

My bad, he's still over doing the expat thing in Norway.

>> Oh boo hoo hoo...and you run your multiple socks and then accuse others
>> of doing the same - grow up you hypocritical libitard.
>>
> Keep it up, lie like the Muslim rug you are and accuse others of
> lying.

"Muslim"?

Lol, you moron.

>> Oh lookie, it's the precise same game he played with me, lol.
>>
> Telling yourself jokes again Spammy?

Is it early onset senilty that's getting you?

>>
>> You spend an inordinate amount of time crediting others with your own sins.
>>
> A common right wing tactic you know only so well.

You're projecting again.

>>
>> No surprise really, as we all saw you whine about how dependent you are
>> on Medicare and then in the same breath give Obama a pass for looting
>> $716 billion out of it by rationalizing that he wasn't the first to make
>> cuts to Medicare.
>>
> We all? Hahahah, you and all your socks? Brilliant, Spammy, Brilliant.

Anyone who was reading the thread saw it, cope.

>>
>> That is the pure measure of your core hypocrisy.
>>
> Have you measured your nose lately?  Bet it's getting longer every
> day.

Why do you vote against your own best interests?

>>
>> Oh how the hypocrisy oozes forth.
>>
> You've been doing a bang up job of it so far.

Nah, all I do is expose yours.

>>
>> You spent nearly a full week trying to debate me and collapsed in a
>> paroxysm of munged followups and canned off-topic article re-posts.
>>
> Hahah, now you ride another planet with Romney's god no doubt.

See how little touch with reality you have, that's pretty odd as replies go.

>>
>> Your problem is you lie so much you are incapable of ever telling the truth.
>>
> That's you all right, to an S - for Spammy.

Pot-kettle-?

>>
>>
>> Well there's the root of the problem, you paid Dem troll, we dare to
>> speak factually about the vast inconsistencies and lies of the left.
>>
> That's the real problem. Your idea of fact is in reality, just right
> wing bullshit.

Nah, I cite from the left just enough to tie you Dem trolls in knots, 
that's where the real fun begins, when I use HuffPoo against you, lol.

>>
>> That infuriates you, which is a good thing.
>>
> Hahah, keep it up. Your blood pressure's giving you away.

Projection again, old man.

>>
>> Iow, any opinions but those from the left are unwelcome in your
>> shuttered reality, right?
>>
> I respect your right to be wrong. You live with it, not me.

I disrespect your intellectual deceit and closed mind.

>>
>> Also handily disabused by the time and emotion you have already spent
>> here venting - hypocrite.
>>
> You called it fun and I didn't disagree. Now it's emotion spent and
> you call me names? Hahaha.

It's your apoplexy, I just set it off as I see fit, lol.

>>
>> Oh I get it, so now Gunner is me?
>>
> Oh you are?

See what a liar you are.

>>
>> You have some real brain damage there.
>>
> You're looking in a mirror again.

You're projecting again, old man.

>>
>> Um, I didn't post this one Dem troll, that was Gunner.
>>
>> Try and grasp reality please.
>>
> I've got it. You are one sick dude.  There, ok now?

So you admit that Gunner is a another person?

>>
>> I do get the team approach, Dem troll.
>>
> Yep, Spammy, Spammy and Spammy and ? whose next in line Spammy?

I think you're brain is frying again.

>>
>> And I also get the desperation you lot have now.
>>
> Yes I can see that in your but add frustration.

Pot-kettle.

>>
>> It is a reasonable response to the traction your Obamessiah has lost and
>> the impending economic downturn.
>>
> It's Mr. President to you.

Is it?

>>
>> Your emotive whining is amusing, but just barely.
>>
> Some of the things you say are amusing but you are not funny.  I can't
> laugh too hard at the handicapped even one that gets himself in
> trouble.

Why sure you can, all good libs like to co-opt and use the less 
fortunate - it's the base equation their philosophy is authored upon.