🚀 go-pugleaf

<j7gsb.23459$Ws6.19385@edtnps84>Sharxster wrote:
> 
> "Truth Dude" <youcanthandleit@f**ku.org> wrote in message
> news:20031111000603470-0700@news.telusplanet.net...
>> Check this reply, BONEHEAD....
>>
>>
>> >> November 10, 2003
>> >>
>> >> To: Telus.Com <abuse@telus.com>
>> >> Re: Usenet Abuse by Telus Customer
>>
>>
>> >>In reference to the message I received in regards to these allegations,
>> >>let me remind you of >>the following...
>>
>> >>The person who filed this charge uses an anonymous remailer in all his
>> >>correspondence; >>therefore, I suggest that this charge cannot be
>> >>considered serious as a *real* person with a >>*real* identity cannot 
>> >>be contacted in regards to their charge.
>>
>> >>The newsgroups in question are, for the most part, cesspools of 
>> >>vicious content anyway; >>therefore, making such a charge cannot be 
>> >>taken seriously anyway.
>>
>> >>Don't you have better things to do than watch ngs?
>>
>> The remainder of my reply emphasised that the marketplace for ISPs is
> quite
>> competitive and, in comparison to the often failing service that Telus
>> provides these days, far more effective service-wise. I advised Mr.
>> Crawford to govern himself accordingly and that he should "think twice"
>> before he takes a bite out of his employer's revenue.
>>
>> Just as a side issue, I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of
>> ocassions and found him to be not only very agreeable, but also ready to
>> see a Telus subscriber's point of view over a complaint from someone who
> is
>> not. Needless to say, money talks and bullshit walks: I have the money 
>> and KATO is full of the bullshit.
> 
> You have the money? Did you sell off your copies of FagQ?

I take it you're a LIFETIME SUBSCRIBER.