🚀 go-pugleaf

Check this reply, BONEHEAD....


>> November 10, 2003
>>
>> To: Telus.Com <abuse@telus.com>
>> Re: Usenet Abuse by Telus Customer


>>In reference to the message I received in regards to these allegations, 
>>let me remind you of >>the following...

>>The person who filed this charge uses an anonymous remailer in all his 
>>correspondence; >>therefore, I suggest that this charge cannot be 
>>considered serious as a *real* person with a >>*real* identity cannot be 
>>contacted in regards to their charge.

>>The newsgroups in question are, for the most part, cesspools of vicious 
>>content anyway; >>therefore, making such a charge cannot be taken 
>>seriously anyway.

>>Don't you have better things to do than watch ngs?

The remainder of my reply emphasised that the marketplace for ISPs is quite 
competitive and, in comparison to the often failing service that Telus 
provides these days, far more effective service-wise. I advised Mr. 
Crawford to govern himself accordingly and that he should "think twice" 
before he takes a bite out of his employer's revenue.

Just as a side issue, I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of 
ocassions and found him to be not only very agreeable, but also ready to 
see a Telus subscriber's point of view over a complaint from someone who is 
not. Needless to say, money talks and bullshit walks: I have the money and 
KATO is full of the bullshit.