🚀 go-pugleaf

<b6cd7d38807c8b8ba39acb27c4c32a32@news.teranews.com>Lie Detector  wrote:
> 
> 
> Truth Dude wrote:
> 
>> <22969b572798c901d2ddb50f216f6ae7@news.teranews.com>Lie Detector  wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Truth Dude wrote:
>> >
>> >> Check this reply, BONEHEAD....
>> >>
>> >> >> November 10, 2003
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: Telus.Com <abuse@telus.com>
>> >> >> Re: Usenet Abuse by Telus Customer
>> >>
>> >> >>In reference to the message I received in regards to these 
>> >> >>allegations, let me remind you of >>the following...
>> >>
>> >> >>The person who filed this charge uses an anonymous remailer in all 
>> >> >>his correspondence; >>therefore, I suggest that this charge cannot 
>> >> >>be considered serious as a *real* person with a >>*real* identity 
>> >> >>cannot be contacted in regards to their charge.
>> >>
>> >> >>The newsgroups in question are, for the most part, cesspools of
>> >> >>vicious content anyway; >>therefore, making such a charge cannot be
>> >> >>taken seriously anyway.
>> >>
>> >> >>Don't you have better things to do than watch ngs?
>> >>
>> >> The remainder of my reply emphasised that the marketplace for ISPs is
>> >> quite competitive and, in comparison to the often failing service 
>> >> that Telus provides these days, far more effective service-wise. I 
>> >> advised Mr. Crawford to govern himself accordingly and that he should 
>> >> "think twice" before he takes a bite out of his employer's revenue.
>> >>
>> >> Just as a side issue, I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of
>> >> ocassions and found him to be not only very agreeable, but also ready 
>> >> to see a Telus subscriber's point of view over a complaint from 
>> >> someone who is not. Needless to say, money talks and bullshit walks: 
>> >> I have the money and KATO is full of the bullshit.
>> >
>> > You're a fucking liar. You overplayed your hand. If Crawford sent a
>> > complaint to Telus on Monday November 10th, you want us to believe 
>> > that you heard from them already?
>>
>> It maybe that he was working late, answer all those complaints from 
>> people who didn't like it when someone hurt their feelings on an ng.
>>
>> Poor dears.
> 
> No, you were just conjuring up total bullshit which is your sole talent 
> in life.

Nobody does it better.


> 
> 
>> > It takes longer than that asshole. In your mental holodeck, you 
>> > resolved the whole issue before Crawford even received an automated 
>> > reply. Not bloody likely.

Considering Telus' reponse to most inquiries takes at least three months 
these days, the quick reply was out of sorts. No doubt Mr. Crawford had 
some free time.


>> >
>> > "I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of occasions"
>> >
>> > BULLSHIT.  You never heard of Crawford before 10 November.
>>
>> And I doubt that you heard of me prior to that date as well. Does this 
>> make full of even more shit?
> 
> It isn't about me, it's about you fool You're the one making the claims 
> of receiving 'responses' from Telus, and claiming that you've 'dealt' 
> with Crawford before. So provide the emails, with headers, and put your 
> money where your mouth is.

Oh, this is all about you.

How about you provide some evidence as to why this isn't about you?


>
> Unfortunately for you, you can't. Maybe Crawford will follow up and 
> confirm or deny whether or not he's had any contacts with you. You'll be 
> proven once more to be a fucking liar, which is the only thing you'll 
> ever be.

So, what is the point of your inquistion? Lost your girlfriend to your net 
addiction?


>
>> > You fail the test. Your status as an unmitigated liar is confirmed.
>> >
>> > Adios chump.
>>
>> Do I win a prize? Maybe free meal coupons at Taco Bell?
> 
> You win a shit sandwich asshole.
> 
> Chow down.

I've never eaten at Panda Gardens.