🚀 go-pugleaf

Analyzer wrote:
> It is not credible to belive that the American military can land a 2,000
> 
>>lb bomb in the back seat of a vehicle from 1,000 miles away and not be
>>able to monitor a few miles of border for illeagal shipments.

> A FEW MILES OF BORDER??????? Are you on crack????? What an utterly stupid
> comparison. That is like saying, the American medical profession can transplant
> a heart and lungs in one operation, yet can not cure the cold.

Incorrect.

That is a flawed analogy.

Iraq has been under constant scrutiny by the US, the UN and other 
countries for a decade.  They have gone into Iraq, found, and destroyed 
bio/chemical weapons in that period of time.

Even CNN is asking the question about just where are those wmds?

> Technology is no
> everything. You seem to have a very limited knowledge of American military
> capabilities and incapability's.

They have the ability to monitor.  They have used that ability.  They 
are very good at it.

They have been watching Iraw for a decade.

They have invaded and taken over Iraq.

They have captured many top Iraqi officials.

Yet, still no wmds.

> No surprise coming from you. To give you an
> example, it was not until the forces were on the ground that they discovered oil
> and gas pipelines going into Syria. Hmmmm, if the military can not spot
> pipelines from the air, what chance do you think they can spot buried WMD's, or
> WMD's being destroyed before UN inspectors show up, or WMD's leaving the
> country, etc.

Sorry friend, they knew about those pipelines.

>>Iraq has been under the microscope for many months.


> Nice catch phrase, but not in the true sense of the word.

Correct.  They have been under the microscope for a decade :)

>>Besides.  If they had them, what the hell are they waiting for to use them?


> Perhaps they realize that if they did, or if they were to be caught with them
> now, after denying it for so long, they would prove Bush right. A theory shared
> by many, many except myopic people like you and Halick.

They have been obliterated.

What would hold them back, Elmer the Safety Elephant?

>>The US went into Baghdad without any use of wmds.  The entire regime has
>>been taken out; yet they did not use any wmds.


> I have already answered that, if you can not comprehend, that is not my problem.

So they have these weapons, they are a crazy regeime that has used them 
in the past; yet when faced with certain destruction they chose to find 
morality and allow themselves to be wiped out rather than fight back 
with everything they got, including wmds?

That does not make any sense.

The only plausible explaination is that Saddam destroyed the wmds over 
the course of the past decade and was counting on the US following 
International law.  Which, he US chose not to do.

When the time came, the cupboard was bare for Saddam.

>>Why?

>>They didn't have any.


> Are you ever going to look foolish when they do find them, or when they do find
> out what happened to the
> 600 TONNES OF UNACCOUNTED CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL AGENTS THAT EVEN THE USELESS
> UN ACKNOWLEDGES ARE UNACCOUNTED FOR!!!! 

Used in manufacturing because they couldn't import any more chemicals 
for their factories.