🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:39:37 GMT, "Frank E. Spencer"
<romstar.orion@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:

>
>"Andrew" <andrewnospam@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:JjET9.13347$sV3.543247@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
>
>> I'm sorry but me owning the government money in no way correlates to me
>> owing them access to my DNA.
>
>Are you stoned or stupid? Pay attention for a moment, and read before you
>comment.

Frank,,,I think he is saying,,,,, that he thinks your take on it is
incorrect. No need to get personal. Everyone doesn't see things your
way, That doesn't make them stupid or wrong. Your views aren't always
correct. Another case of sleep deprivation? Lighten up.......
>
>Okay, in the case of the DMV, if you owe the government any money, they can
>refuse you services until you pay that money. This is the stance they take,
>regardless of the fact that your taxes pay for the institution, and you are
>paying the requested fee for the services. Like your license or a vehicle
>registration. As far as they are concerned it doesn't matter. You owe money,
>so you can't have service. This is the mentality.
>Now, lets fast forward to a DNA database, using the same screwed up
>mentality.
>This time, they made it law that you have to provide a DNA sample to the
>database. Remember, this is law not voluntary.
>So, you go to the doctor, or hospital for an injury perhaps, or illness and
>they say they have to get your DNA sample from you. You protest because you
>don't believe they should have it. They simply say you can't be treated
>then.
>You want treatment, you let them take a blood sample for your DNA. Or, they
>simply take it and don't tell you because it's the law anyway and you are
>supposed to provide a sample. If you have nothing to hide why worry right?
>Never mind the fact that your taxes pay for medical care, or the hospital or
>anything else. The new law says, no DNA, no service.
>
>The same mentality prevails. It isn't about money, it's about the way they
>think.
>Keep in mind, you pay your taxes, and certain services are presumed. Granted
>we agree that a fee to register a car, or issue a license is okay because
>stuff does cost money. However, they decided that if you owe money to the
>government, they will not provide you services which you should be able to
>receive.
>The law is non discriminatory as well. It doesn't matter if you owe fines on
>vehicle infractions, or fines resulting from an assault case, or from
>failure to pay child support.
>If you owe ANY money you can't get a license, or register a vehicle, or a
>whole host of other government services until you pay what you owe.
>They will carry over this thinking to any DNA database idea they conceive.
>It will become law that you must provide a sample. If you don't provide a
>sample, you can't receive medical services. Conversely, they might just take
>the sample anyway, and never tell you about it. Justification, it's the law
>and only a person with something to hide would argue.
>If you do have something to hide, well it's good that they took the sample
>then isn't it. One more unsolved rape case closed.
>
>Frank E. Spencer
>,