🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: wpg.general
Article #4707

Re: Gun Registry

#4707
From: Craig Tataryn
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:08
47 lines
4180 bytes
Well, I am fine with the existing non-restricted storage laws, I believe
them to be more than adequate. If someone broke into my house and they gave
me a minute to go grab my gun, I still wouldn't have enough time to unlock
them and load them :)  It's the transportation law that I would have a
problem with.  For instance, with restricted firearms such as pistols, you
literally cannot stop at McDonalds for a burger after hitting the shooting
range.  As well, you wouldn't be able to bring it out to your cottage for
target practice either.  I take my guns out to Kenora to a friends cabin to
shoot skeet (and we make multiple stops going there and coming back), if
long arms became restricted the only shooting you would be doing is at the
range.

Craig.

Sensei Brent wrote:
> Craig Tataryn wrote:
>
>> I would feel a whole lot better about the gun registry if they put a
>> statement in the act that said:
>>
>> "All non-restricted firearms registered will remain as
>> non-restrticted".  I believe other countries such as UK/Austrailia
>> imposed similar laws as the one we are implementing.  Once their law
>> abiding citizens registered their non-restricted firearms (shotguns,
>> hunting rifles) they said "Oh, by the way we are now classifying
>> guns those as restricted/phrohibited"
>>
>> Correct me if I am wrong, as I may not have all the details correct.
>>
>> Craig.
>
> When all are registered the only difference between restricted and
> unrestricted is the transfer, storage and transportation
> requirements. Does it really matter. I don't see any problem
> requiring the more stringent storage/ transportation  requirements
> for long arms.  In effect all firearms are to some degree restricted
> as you must have a license and register them.
>
>
> Prohibited is another matter, but they will not prohibit long-arms
> because of the large rural base, particularly in northern Canada,
> that legitimately needs them.  The list has to remain open  to some
> degree to classify new or modified weapons.
>
> And by the way I am a shooter who fully supports the gun laws.
>
> Sensei Brent
Technical Details
Message-ID: <SEkT9.6615$sV3.248021@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news3.calgary.shaw.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <3E1708BB.3020805@mts.net> <FqER9.3976$Hs3.480168@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <c5GR9.82876$na.2200867@news2.calgary.shaw.ca> <wiGR9.4032$Hs3.486285@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <ekZR9.229805$Qr.6418623@news3.calgary.shaw.ca> <g9_R9.4562$Hs3.536822@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <Sf6S9.232168$Qr.6564478@news3.calgary.shaw.ca> <3e194eac.1492898019@news.pacificcoast.net> <ZjqS9.92993$na.2651620@news2.calgary.shaw.ca> <Xns92FBD9F471C5Ffredm@24.69.255.211> <3_MS9.99720$na.2910386@news2.calgary.shaw.ca> <Xns92FCDCD9A1EBBfredm@24.69.255.211> <3e1db0c1.262113674@news1.attglobal.net> <bOjT9.6281$Yo4.353065@news1.calgary.shaw.ca> <3E1DCDF0.207CD245@shaw.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,2795ce8dca4e9713
X-Google-Attributes: gid109a5e,public
X-Google-Thread: 1083bf,2795ce8dca4e9713
X-Google-Attributes: gid1083bf,public
X-Google-Thread: fbdd9,2795ce8dca4e9713
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbdd9,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c64,2795ce8dca4e9713
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c64,public
X-Google-Thread: 10643c,2795ce8dca4e9713
X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-09 12:08:45 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news3.calgary.shaw.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.10.219
From: "Craig Tataryn" <craiger@tataryn.NOT>
Newsgroups: wpg.general,tor.general,calgary.general,hfx.general,van.general
References: <3E1708BB.3020805@mts.net> <FqER9.3976$Hs3.480168@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <c5GR9.82876$na.2200867@news2.calgary.shaw.ca> <wiGR9.4032$Hs3.486285@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <ekZR9.229805$Qr.6418623@news3.calgary.shaw.ca> <g9_R9.4562$Hs3.536822@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <Sf6S9.232168$Qr.6564478@news3.calgary.shaw.ca> <3e194eac.1492898019@news.pacificcoast.net> <ZjqS9.92993$na.2651620@news2.calgary.shaw.ca> <Xns92FBD9F471C5Ffredm@24.69.255.211> <3_MS9.99720$na.2910386@news2.calgary.shaw.ca> <Xns92FCDCD9A1EBBfredm@24.69.255.211> <3e1db0c1.262113674@news1.attglobal.net> <bOjT9.6281$Yo4.353065@news1.calgary.shaw.ca> <3E1DCDF0.207CD245@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Gun Registry
Lines: 49
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <SEkT9.6615$sV3.248021@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:08:18 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.66.94.143
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
X-Trace: news3.calgary.shaw.ca 1042142898 24.66.94.143 (Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:08:18 MST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:08:18 MST
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet