🚀 go-pugleaf

"Dr. Fred Mbogo" <fred-mbogo@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Xns92FBD9F471C5Ffredm@24.69.255.211...
> "Calgary Rob" <calgaryrobnospam@shaw.ca> wrote in
> news:ZjqS9.92993$na.2651620@news2.calgary.shaw.ca:
>
> > "Karl Pollak" <xuser@spamblock.org> wrote in message
> > news:3e194eac.1492898019@news.pacificcoast.net...
> >> Can you give us any good argument on why the State should have any
> >> citizen's genetic blueprint?
> >
> > Because if there is any crime commited, if there is any genetic
> > fingerprints so to speak left behind, than that could be used to catch
> > the criminal.  In other words, one crime committed could lead to an
> > arrest.  No wondering.
>
> That doesn't require a DNA database. We already have the option of
> DNA testing crime scene evidence. (I even worry about that because
> it's the kind of evidence that seems so strong that people will tend
> to assume it's perfect.)

And how are they supposed to do that with no DNA database?

>
> The difference the database would make is that the fuzz would be able
> to take samples from the crime scene and have the computer tell them
> who their suspects should be. That's not necessary nor is it a good
> idea.

That is a great idea.  I cannot fathom how it could be a bad idea.  The cops
find a glove with hair in it at a crime scene.  They prove only one person
wore the glove.  They find that the person who owned the glove also has the
families stereo in his living room.  The guy admits to guilt.  One guy
caught!

>
> It ranks right alongside fingerprinting children. How would you like it
> if, on their first day of school, your kids were fingerprinted on the
> assumption they might one day commit a crime?

What is wrong with fingerprinting children?  I still have not heard a reason
why any of this is bad.  Read your paragraph, and you tell me what is wrong
with fingerprinting?  Some countries do it to everyone.  When I lived in
Panama, and Nicaragua, they both finger printed me.


--

Calgary Rob
calgaryrob@shaw.ca
I like Gravy