🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <ToqS9.236661$Qr.6708155@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>, 
calgaryrobnospam@shaw.ca says...
>
>"Andrew" <andrewnospam@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:BOfS9.358199$ka.9576580@news1.calgary.shaw.ca...
>>
>> "Calgary Rob" <calgaryrobnospam@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:Sf6S9.232168$Qr.6564478@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
>> > "Dave" <dave128@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:g9_R9.4562$Hs3.536822@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> > > DNA evidence allows you to determine who committed a crime by using
>> > evidence
>> > > left behind at some crimes to help identify the participants. In order
>> > that
>> > > this is easier you want to establish a DNA fingerprint of the
>populace.
>> > > Please keep in mind that this will cost way more than 1 billion
>dollars.
>> >
>> > Why would you say that?  Want to receive health care?  You must provide
>a
>> > sample.  In jail?  Provide a sample.  Want any government service?
>> Provide
>> > a sample.  Etc.
>> \
>> So now the populace must be blackmailed to recieve services that are
>already
>> guaranteed to citizens. Why not just tattoo a barcode on every Canadian's
>> forehead?
>
>Blackmailed?  We should be happy to provide a sample, unless you have
>something to hide, like a rape or something.
>
>>
>> > > It could be misused in this way, many genetic predictors for disease
>and
>> > > other expensive health issues can be identified with DNA profiling.
>> > > Insurance companies would love to be able to get this information and
>> use
>> > it
>> > > to determine their risk in covering you. Laws have already been
>drafted
>> to
>> > > prevent this, I'm pretty sure they have not reached the point of
>> > > consideration for law.
>> >
>> > And since when should someone else be responsible for your health?
>>
>> Since the Canadian government made health care equally accessible for all
>> people.
>
>That makes the government responsible for providing health care, that is for
>sure.  However, I was clearly talking about the insurance companies.  Read
>it again, but read the quote from Dave.
>
>>
>> > Another boo hoo whiner who is ready to send someone to die in another
>> > country, yet cannot put up with 'an invasion of privacy' to protect
>their
>> > own neighbors.
>>
>> Your right to privacy is your most valuable right. Many other rights fall
>> under this category. What you propose would turn Canadian citizens into
>> government property. Sure we may be safer, but at such a huge cost.
>
>Why is that my most valuable right?  Seems like rhetoric to me.  I would
>gladly provide a sample, as have several communities in the past few years
>in order to expose a criminal.  I have no problem with that, and support
>increased moves to the area of providing genetic samples into a database in
>order to prevent crime.  As well, I am also into more research into the
>subject so a better formulated opinion could be made.
>

or thinking that SUVs pollute more than cars.. that makes you a terrorist 
according to some fucktards.

slippery slope... too many fucktards...