🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <wNmdnZ5QF4BLcyTRnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@vex.net>,
Kenneth McVay OBC <kmcvay@shell.vex.net> wrote:
>In article <i9c9td$eb6$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>In article <09Sdne8UQK_0jiTRnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@vex.net>,
>>Kenneth McVay OBC <kmcvay@shell.vex.net> wrote:
>>>In article <6pfhb6thka2vrojhiaq6tmhgnmopi9fkkt@4ax.com>,
>>>Moldy Bread  <MoldyBread@redmonton.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Oh, look! There's William Grosvenor's favorite
>>>newsreader again!
>>>
>>>Updated Grosvenor Legal Documents & Extortion conviction: 
>>>http://William-Grosvenor.info
>>>
>>>William Grosvenor is a convicted extortionist who
>>>devotes his time to spreading hatred and defamation.
>>>
>>>Grosvenor recently complied with a court order to pay a 
>>>$50,000 libel award and costs in excess of $30,000 
>>>resulting from his penchant for defamation,
>>>libel, assault and extortion.
>>>
>>>He is, above all, monumentally stupid.
>>>
>>>Grosvenor now lives in exile, a complete disgrace.
>>>
>>>http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html
>>>
>>>Defamation
>>>
>>>[52]      In Botiuk v. Toronto Free Press Publications
>>>Ltd., 1995 CanLII 60 (S.C.C.), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 3
>>>(S.C.C.), Cory J. said, at para. 62,
>>>
>>>   [A] publication which tends to lower a person in the
>>>estimation of right-thinking members of society, or to
>>>expose a person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, is
>>>defamatory and will attract liability.What is
>>>defamatory may be determined from the ordinary meaning
>>>of the published words themselves or from the
>>>surrounding circumstances. 
>>>                         
>>>[53]      The tort of defamation consists of the two
>>>torts of libel and slander.  The law of libel and
>>>slander protects an individual.s reputation.  Libel is
>>>any publication of defamatory material.  The law
>>>presumes that the words are false unless and until the
>>>defendant proves the contrary.  In order to succeed in
>>>his defamatory action, the plaintiff must establish
>>>each of the following three elements on a balance of
>>>probabilities:  (1) the words are defamatory; (2) the
>>>words are published; (3) the plaintiff is the person
>>>defamed: Rainaldi, Remedies in Tort, looseleaf
>>>(Carswell, 2006), at pp. 6-20.
>>>
>>>[54]      With respect to the first element, the
>>>Postings on the various websites and with the various
>>>website groups are clearly defamatory according to
>>>their ordinary meaning.  They are calculated to be
>>>personally and professionally insulting and demeaning.
>>>They refer to the plaintiff as a dishonest man, liar,
>>>scumbag, pimp and disgusting maggot, to name a few.
>>>They falsely allege that the plaintiff is part of
>>>organized crime and financed by .mobs..  They falsely
>>>allege that the plaintiff was convicted of child
>>>molestation.  They attack the plaintiff.s credibility
>>>and reputation as a lawyer.  They significantly
>>>discredit his personal and professional reputation and
>>>they do so over and over again.  They heap hatred,
>>>contempt and ridicule on the plaintiff and by their
>>>volume and wide dissemination, they seriously expose
>>>the plaintiff to hatred, contempt and ridicule from
>>>others.  As the plaintiff testified at trial, to be
>>>falsely alleged to be a pedophile convicted of sexual
>>>assault against a young person is particularly hurtful.
>>>
>>>[55]      With respect to the second element, I have no
>>>difficulty concluding that the defamatory words are
>>>published.  The Internet is a means of publication like
>>>no other, given its ability to instantaneously send
>>>words throughout the world to the millions who have
>>>access to computers.  The defendant has caused
>>>defamatory words to be communicated to others by the
>>>Postings and each time he has re-posted the same
>>>defamatory words in the Postings, he has created a new
>>>publishing of these words.
>>>
>>>[56]      I also have no difficulty concluding that the
>>>third element has been established, in that the
>>>plaintiff was clearly the person being defamed.  The
>>>defendant mentioned the plaintiff.s name in all of the
>>>Fourteen Postings referred to above.  In some of the
>>>Postings, the defendant included links to a picture of
>>>the plaintiff.
>>>
>>>[57]      It is for these reasons I conclude that the
>>>defendant.s Postings have defamed the plaintiff.
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Who is your choice for the Dumbest celebrity?  George W. Bush
>>>holds a commanding lead at 28.6%, Kurt Knoll is second at 
>>>20.3% & Paris Hilton 3rd with 17.2%.            VOTE NOW, 
>>>   VOTE OFTEN: http://squidoo.com/think-you-are-stupid-eh
>
>>Nice too see you again.  Please add Mr.SmartyPants to nizkor .
>
>Why bother? Google archives everything these days, so
>Mr. Hamilton's contributions to the sewers of the world
>are there for all to see.
>
>-- 
>"The Nizkor website (secretly financed by the ADL and other Jewish front
>organizations) is behind it." (David Irving, whining about Google's 
>reminder of his disgrace.) The facts:
>http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/judgment-00-00.html

What do you expect from a rancid sewer rat.
-- 
Member - Liberal International	This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! 
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
Are you a real human: http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1334.cfm