🚀 go-pugleaf

"Orion" <Orion@nospam.com> wrote in message 
news:440186D3.6A0218B1@nospam.com...
> Glen Hallick wrote:
>>
>> "Sew" <sewbeit@nosuchaddress.ca> wrote in message
>> news:div102trvmkpsqocektblu4tbm9gjrmtss@4ax.com...
>> > On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:36:24 -0600, "Glen Hallick"
>> > <gNOSPAMhallick@mts.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>"Irish.Eyes" <Irish.Eyes@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> >>news:_N_Lf.70551$B94.61221@pd7tw3no...
>> >>>
>> >>>  "Darren Gudmundson" <s8472@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> >>> news:dkRLf.67556$sa3.31701@pd7tw1no...
>> >>>
>> >>>  > I am NOT a Liberal.
>> >>>
>> >>>  lol! Not in this group... If you're not a conservative... you *must* 
>> >>> be
>> >>> liberal.
>> >>>  Sad, but, seemingly, true...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Bang on. The rabid tirades of foaming mouth rightoids often attack 
>> >>others
>> >>for being Liberals. It's the rightoid train of thought, or lack 
>> >>thereof,
>> >>that anyone that doesn't agree with you is to be robotically deemed a
>> >>Liberal. Thinking and intelligence have never been the strong suits of 
>> >>the
>> >>rightoid set.
>> >
>> > I guess fairness and honesty are NOT words in your vocabulary.
>> >
>> >>
>>
>> Sure they are. Why deal with an ignorant rightoid on the same level as 
>> some
>> one else?
>
>
>  Why label everyone to the left of your beloved NDP as a "ignorant 
> rightoid"?

My beloved NDP?

That's rich.




> With a maturity level like that, why should anyone take anything you have 
> to say
> seriously?

That's up to the reader.

>
>
>> Take "sharkshit" for example,
>
>
> ...and there it is again. Pitiful.
>

Oh boo-who-who. Your words have the tinge of rightoid snobbery.

>
>> it's clear in this thread that
>> people have tried to be respectful towards him and what happens?
>
>
>  What people have tried to be respectful towards him? I just looked 
> through a
> bunch of responses and I can't seem to find any examples of this. I *did*,
> however, notice that his first post was in response to the ever-polite and
> respectful Robert Sveinson (one of your ilk, of course).

Hint...DG.

>> gets more and more vicious in his responses. So why be nice to the 
>> asshole?
>
>
>  Why be nice to *you*, with your propensity for name-calling and 
> stereotyping?
>

Me, name-calling? Sterotyping? Who would have thunk it? Look carefully at 
who I have responded to in the thread then you will see more clearly.



>> Furthermore I've dealt with enough rightoids in the newsgroups to learn a
>> few things. One, they love to accuse others of the very things they are
>> guilty of. Two, they have a deep hatred for facts that disprove their
>> rhetoric. Three, they are so wrapped in a partisan fanatsy world that 
>> they
>> react with great fury to anyone that doesn't kowtow their opinions.
>
>
>  That's funny...going through the posts here, I see far more of that 
> behaviour
> from the left. Care to count them up?


Your assumption is that I am responding to everyone that might be considered 
to be on the political right. It's abundantly clear that I am not. Like 
everyone else in a newsgroup I pick and chose the posts that I want to 
respond. It's obvious that most of my responses are directed to the most 
ignorant, showing them to be the fools that they are. And I don't consider 
everyine right-winger to be a rightoid, only those on the extreme.



Glen