🚀 go-pugleaf

"Terry Johns" <tjohns@F*****Flongcoat.com> wrote in message
news:q21mtu0f3k7ismfunf26goq0fie2vkh2gl@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:59:14 -0500, shepatREMOVETHIS@sympatico.ca
> wrote:
>
> >snipped everything but wpg.general
> >
> >On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:06:31 -0600, Terry Johns <tjohns@longcoat.com>
posted:
> >
> >>On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:39:23 -0600, "Raymond J. Henry"
> >><rayhenry@TROLLmts.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Guess what? There is no law to make them provide you with service. They
have
> >>>the right to decide that due to the increased man-hours you create by
your
> >>>antagonistic posting methods on newsgroups that it's not feasible to
provide
> >>>you with service at the specified costs. This is 100% legitimate.
> >>
> >>The scary thing about all this is the fact that he really believes he
> >>didn't do anything wrong.
> >>
> >>His threats to visit Peter's Kid's school for no apparent reason.
> >>
> >>His threats to send out faxes to potential employers of gutz.
> >>
> >>His libel of many users.
> >>
> >>Funny thing is, a few other posters have disappeared since he did as
> >>well.....
> >>
> >>I wonder what Sheila's opinion is on the subject?
> >
> >I think they had the right to do it for the same reasons Ray does.  I
don't
> >think they should have done it, and you already know why.
>
> Actually I don't know the reason why. You do believe that people
> should be responsible for their actions or voices don't you? How else
> do you make a person like bayomi responsible for some of the crap he
> has been posting for years? How else do you make him responsible for
> the lies he continues to post and please don't suggest court again.
>
> He has just been made painfully responsible for what he has done and
> said on this newsgroup.
>
> Some people such as iili are suggest that everyone in here is a
> hypocrite. Most people put up with bayomi's abuse for years before
> finally saying enough is enough. If someone was standing outside my
> house for days on end yelling and screaming stupidity I would soon
> have them removed.


You'd probably invite them in for drinks


> >He shouldn't be surprised that they finally decided to pull the plug.  He
was
> >told by people in the news group that Shaw could and would do it for
basically
> >any reason they chose.  He didn't learn from Ms. Amero's identical
experience
> >with Chebucto, or whatever it's called.
> >
> >I've been too busy to answer your questions.  I'll try to do it tonight
or
> >tomorrow.
> >
> >Sheila Paterson
> >Note:  address transmogrified.
>