🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 02:02:10 GMT, Norman Gall <gall@spookyhill.net>
wrote:

>In article <n9PC9.50893$15.16050@www.newsranger.com>, iili
><nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
>
>> > Here Darren S is complaining about what happened to bayomi. Where was
>> > he and all the rest of these whining little babies when bayomi tried
>> > to get Norm fired by calling his employer, in fact both his employers.
>> > Where were all of them when bayomi called both Norms ISP's and tried
>> > to get his account pulled.
>
>> His posts were obscene, rude, obnoxious, foul mouthed, etc. etc. etc.  That's
>> allowed, BUT NOT when MY tax dollars pay his wages, and pay his internet
>> account from the University. 
>
>Your tax dollars, in part, paid for part of my salary. My salary pays
>for everything I do. However, you didn't have any claim to tell me what
>I could do with any other part of my salary. So, your tax dollars, if
>indeed you've ever paid any, don't give you any claim to tell me what
>to do online, in my classroom, in my work, or anywhere else.

Norm give him his buck and a quarter back. I'm trying to figure out
what posts of yours were obscene or foul mouthed and as for rude I
wasn't aware that was part of an AUP.

>Now that I'm a taxpayer in Alberta, *I* help pay for a good deal of the
>operation of your province. Are you now going to argue that I can tell
>Manitobans what you can do in your hospitals, classrooms, etc.?
>
>> Bayomi had every right to complain as with many many
>> mannnnnnyyyyyy others who I am sure complained also.
>
>Actually, _no_ one else complained and he was dismissed as a kook by
>all involved in the incident.

So bayomi had every right to complain but no one had a right to
complain about bayomi......I'm sure this nimrod has some reasoning
there but for the life of me I can't see it.......guess he, shew and
darren s all go to the same doctor.