🚀 go-pugleaf

Look....in a newsgroup world of potentially millions of newsgroup
readers...I'm sure that there are at least one or two who would take
exception to ANYTHING that a few of you post.

1. Pete can just be quiet because he has publicly uttered what I have taken
to be threats on a public newsgroup and he is now afraid being challenged on
it

2. there are clear demarcations ** between posts mentioned in my threads and
only a baffoon would make a mistake and think that they were all one

3. The only violation is from my provider would be if I posted to more than
1 newsgroups at once which I do not.

This newsgroup can.legal is perfectly valid as I am asking about what kinds
of threads can be considered actionable.

I also wish to post these comments on other newsgroups in which a few
posters from wpg.general have made repeated offensive comments towards other
users particularly one named Barbra.




"beergut" <dondoherty@canada.com> wrote in message
news:3db6bb71.13158901@news1.mts.net...
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:58:28 GMT, "Peter D" <ple@se.ask> wrote:
>
> >Once again, Don, you have created the impression that the "threats"
> >below are mine. They are not. The only part of this fantasy that is
> >properly attributable to me is the opening quote, and that's from
> >yesterday when I warned you I would take appropriate action to force you
> >to remove, edit, and retract. And I will. Your 24 hours to take
> >corrective action has just been cancelled. You will now reap the
> >consequences of your foolishness.
> >
> >As I said, "I've warned you before of the consequences. Please do take
> >me seriously, Don."
>
> Aww geez.........Is Bayomi trying to garner support from can.legal
> now??
>
> Man.......he's already been asked to stop cross posting to
> can.general, ed.general, alt.freelance journalism........
>
> guess he's going for a record........or global net loon status.....
>
> beergut
>