🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: wpg.general
Article #5816

Re: Newsgroup idiocy on wpg.general repeated sexual harassment: Denial?

#5816
From: �-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:18
101 lines
5230 bytes
Exactly right.

This person thinks that because they can claim to be female that they are
entitled to some different treatment from anyone else on this newsgroup.

A female or any other male can call me or any male any name in the book and
never claim anything.

I have had a female on this newsgroup repeatedly throw profanity at me and
call me names and try to flame or make fun of me and yet its impossible to
give any of it back.

We have used newsgroup flames.

If you want to call it anything then this person is "harrassing me."

Do i want to call it sexual harrassment?

I guess I could.

Does anyone want to call it "sexual harrassment" when she calls me an "f'ing
knob" and I call her "toots"?

So this Sheila person should seriously seek some counselling.



"Zastrozzi" <newsgroup@no-spam.ddiction.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2002.10.21.22.05.21.266019.6273@no-spam.ddiction.com...
> Dear Mother of God.  Are some people utterly incapable of simply ignoring
> those they don't like?  It's a newsgroup.  You don't know this man, have
> never met him, and if you have your way you likely never will.  And yet
> you choose to let him into your life.  *You* choose.  He posts, you read.
>  You get all upset at whatever words he decides to send out that day.
> Why?  Because you choose to read them.  Repeatedly.  Until they stick in
> your head and you let them haunt you and turn into an obsession.
>
> Killfile him if it bugs you so much.  Still see responses to his posts
> from others not as 'wise' as you?  Ignore them.  Is it really so hard to
> ignore someone?  Not if you want to it isn't.
>
> Not sure how religiously you follow this group, but you may have noticed
> I haven't posted sweet flip all in here for some time.  Wanna know why?
>
> I'm gonna tell you anyways.
>
> It's because I can walk away from it.  I don't know and will probably
> never know anyone in here.  I don't care to.  Now and then it's made for
> some interesting and even heated conversation.
>
> Ultimately though, it means as much as university politics.  All the more
> vicious because it's meaningless.
>
> So how about taking a deep adult breath, stepping back and deciding
> whether or not all this effort is really worth it, or whether you can
> just ignore something that should never have been a big deal in the first
> place.
>
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 21:17:00 -0600, Sheila Winterstone muttered darkly:
>
> > Donald Bayomi:
> >
> >>I have now had just about enough of your libelous comments online Miss
> >>Sheila Winterstone.
> >
> > My response:
> >
> > Where are these libelous comments?
> >
> > You have committed sexual harassment. You have made unwanted remarks.
> > You have directed them at females.
> > There is a public record of these facts. These facts are stored on these
> > servers. They can clearly be shown to be your statements made from your
> > computer.
> >
> > No libel.
> > Just facts.
> >
> > Check with your lawyer and the Manitoba Human Rights Commission.. Sue me
> > if you think you have a real case.
> >
> > You should seek help now.
> > You should apologize for your actions. You should delete the offending
> > posts.
> >
> > If not, the following would be appropriate contacts:
> >
> > -the courts.
> > -MHRC.
> > -your relatives--they might be able to convince you to
> >  seek proper psychiatric help.
> >
> > At this stage, you still have a choice. You can claim "stress" or some
> > other vague issue. Otherwise, it is pretty simple. You are a sexual
> > harasser.
> > Bullies and abusers such as yourself are always in constant denial and
> > need to be helped --- for their own good and societies.
>
> --
> This post certified free of windows viruses.
> Debian GNU/Linux
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Pect9.552400$v53.23387975@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!prodigy.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news3.calgary.shaw.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <111d9ae5.0210211916.a3a2c23@posting.google.com> <pan.2002.10.21.22.05.21.266019.6273@no-spam.ddiction.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f504b,4090a68a8c4da016,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,4090a68a8c4da016,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c64,4e30c6ce265c4826
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c64,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-22 06:18:55 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!prodigy.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news3.calgary.shaw.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.231.172
From: "�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I" <taylorchuk@shaw.ca>
Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.legal,can.general
References: <111d9ae5.0210211916.a3a2c23@posting.google.com> <pan.2002.10.21.22.05.21.266019.6273@no-spam.ddiction.com>
Subject: Re:  Newsgroup idiocy on wpg.general repeated sexual harassment: Denial?
Lines: 103
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <Pect9.552400$v53.23387975@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:18:39 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.71.223.147
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
X-Trace: news3.calgary.shaw.ca 1035292719 24.71.223.147 (Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:18:39 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:18:39 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet