🚀 go-pugleaf

My apologies. You are quite correct. Don didn't cross post, he set the
follow-up ngs to crosspost to can.legal and I didn't notice. And here we
are. IOW, I didn't elect to drag it ito can/legal, and I didnt' type
"can.legal" in my list fo groups to post to. I simply clicked on reply
and failed to notice Don's little bit of sleight of hand. And I'll leave
this particular sub-thread at that because it really is another exercise
in futility.
HTH -- and thanks for making me look a little deeper.
--
Peter D

NEWS wrote in message <3d905ca7@news.eol.ca>...
>
>"Peter D" <ple@se.ask> wrote in message
>news:ijSj9.386109$v53.18123215@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
>> Just to clarify, the cross posting to can.legal was done by our
resident
>> netloon and troll, Don Bayomi (taylorchuk) who is infamous for making
>> wild claims and allegations of "obvious criminal behaviour" as part
of
>> his reason for living in Usenet to avoid the real world. He also
enjoys
>> cross-posting to other groups as he trolls for new bites. Amazingly,
>> this time he actually chose an on-topic group, so there's still hope
for
>> him.
>>
>> Peter D
>>
>>
>
>Since we are now in the business of clarifying positions, I think I
should
>give you the chance to clarify your position.  I am fully aware of Don
>Bayomi (taylorchuk) 's propensity to cross post as he has done so a few
>times to Can.Legal in the past.  I also tend to ignore his postings,
but for
>some strange reason I had occassion to look at this topic, and lo and
>behold, it was not Don Bayomi (taylorchuk) that did the cross posting
:-).
>This itself struck me as odd, seeing that his name was in the post
itself.
>It was your Header Details (Peter D.) in the cross post.
>
>If you wish to dispute my findings you may do so, I really do not give
a
>Flying Rat's Ass.  However, as much as I tend to ignore Don Bayomi
>(taylorchuk), I will not stand and let someone falsely accuse another,
such
>as you have done.  Following this post are the headers of this thread,
from
>the start to when Don Bayomi (taylorchuk) first cross posted to
Wpg.Gen. If
>you wish to check them yourself I suggest that you make sure your news
>reader is configured to display all posts, both read and unread.  I
have
>numbered the headers for easy reference as noted:
>
>#1 - First post by Don Bayomi (taylorchuk).
>#15 - First cross post by Peter D.
>#16 - Reply to #15 by Don Bayomi (taylorchuk), as you can see, he has
still
>not cross posted.
>#21 - My post, Don Bayomi (taylorchuk) has still not cross posted and
it is
>now 22 hours after your post.
>#22 - First cross post by  Don Bayomi (taylorchuk) and it is now 29
hours
>after your initial cross post.
>
>Please note all time are GMT.  Here are the headers, edited for
brevity:
>
>1 -PostClient-IP: 24.85.231.172
>From: "�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I" <taylorchuk@shaw.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.general
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 07:54:09 GMT
>
>2 --X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.general
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:41:38 GMT
>
>3 -From: "Unikrom!" <Unikrom@Not_Hotmail.com>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.general
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:35:49 -0500
>
>4 -From: "Unikrom!" <Unikrom@Not_Hotmail.com>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.general
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:15:31 -0500
>
>5 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.general
>Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:38:41 GMT
>
>6 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.231.172
>From: "�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I" <taylorchuk@shaw.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.general
>Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:12:46 GMT
>
>7 -From: "Brian Lundeen" <blundeen@spam.rrc.mb.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Sep 2002 21:18:10 GMT
>
>8 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.231.172
>From: "�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I" <taylorchuk@shaw.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:49:40 GMT
>
>9 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:55:37 GMT
>
>10 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:02:07 GMT
>
>11 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:54:04 GMT
>
>12 -From: "Brian Lundeen" <blundeen@spam.rrc.mb.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Sep 2002 17:13:22 GMT
>
>13 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.231.172
>From: "�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I" <taylorchuk@shaw.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:01:56 GMT
>
>14 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 08:30:15 GMT
>
>15 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.legal,can.general
>Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:32:48 GMT
>
>16 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.231.172
>From: "�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I" <taylorchuk@shaw.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:38:39 GMT
>
>17 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.232.228
>From: "Unikrom!" <Unikrom@Not_Hotmail.com>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.legal,can.general
>Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 21:14:44 GMT
>
>18 -From: gutz <winnipeg_don@yahoo.com>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general
>Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:36:22 -0500
>
>19 -From: "CRussellP" <CRussellP@NOSPAMHotmail.com>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.legal,can.general
>Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:15:15 -0400
>
>20 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.66.46.91
>From: "Peter D" <ple@se.ask>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.legal,can.general
>Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 22:41:25 GMT
>
>21 -From: "NEWS" <wromop@newwws.net>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.legal,can.general
>Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:18:44 -0400
>
>22 -X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.231.172
>From: "�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I" <taylorchuk@shaw.ca>
>Newsgroups: wpg.general,can.legal,can.general
>Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:49:45 GMT
>
>