🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

4 total messages Started by Moldy Bread Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:08
CRA - Go Get Him + Collect All He Owes - Even Prison 4 RODD the Dumb Scammer?
#4848
Author: Moldy Bread
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:08
200 lines
10682 bytes
CRA - Go Get Him - Collect All He Owes - Even Prison 4 RODD?
CRA Going After Ebay Sellers, and Similar Tax Swindlers

CRA=SI Head Office Ottawa
directed CRA=SI Winnipeg District Office
who then ordered Edmonton CRA=SI
who re-opened the fle4s of SI Inspector David Poon - remember him?

Now you will not only have to pay taxes, plus penalties on all your undeclared
income, but probably also PRISON !

You should not have been bragging so much:
>Lots have changed in 4 years, like I have 3 houses in the Edmonton
>area, and a Condo in Radium, BC. 3 Cars, 1 SUV.

All the clowns in Deadmonton want more and more people
to know the truth about this cesspool.

News across Canada have carried the article below over past while.
Guess CRA will also be nailing second-hand dealers flogging on
kijiji,used[city] and barter businesses as well.
Maybe that is why some of the former sellers and barter boys
are now no longer listing their junk for sale on newsgroups -
because they got caught?

People will then have to ship their items out of Canada, and have
them sold in foreign countries, just to avoid paying the proper taxes?

Canadians who are high-volume sellers of products on the online 
eBay marketplace may find themselves being audited by the 
Canada Revenue Agency beginning this fall.

Revenue Minister Jean-Pierre Blackburn said Thursday anyone who has 
sold products on the Web site could avoid audits, fines and penalties by 
voluntarily coming forward and declaring the revenue to the agency.

"Taxpayers should know that the tax laws that apply to traditional 
commerce apply in the same way to electronic commerce, like eBay selling," 
Mr. Blackburn said in a statement. "I strongly encourage eBay sellers, and 
for that matter, any taxpayer who has not already done so, to correct 
their tax affairs as soon as possible to avoid penalties or prosecution."

EBay Canada's head of marketplace development, Andrea Stairs, said the 
company had alerted all members affected by the outcome of a recent 
Federal Court of Canada decision prior to disclosing their account 
information to the CRA.
"To date, there have been no additional information requests from the 
CRA," Ms. Stairs said in a statement. For more information. 
http://www.ebay.ca/powersellerinfo.

The CRA reminded those who may have been flying under the radar that they 
can escape penalty and interest on overdue tax by coming forward under the 
Voluntary Disclosure Program, provided such action is initiated before the 
CRA launches any audit or other compliance act.
The agency says it will begin audits at the end of this summer.

From 2006 to 2008, eBay and the CRA clashed swords over disclosure of 
information on eBay's "PowerSellers" - those who transact at least 
US$1,000 a month in sales. 

eBay Canada balked at disclosing information it considered 
a "violation of our users' privacy," but after an appeal 
was denied the Federal Court of Canada forced it to release information on its
2004 and 2005 PowerSellers, effective Nov. 7, 2008.
Because Canada's tax system relies on voluntary compliance, "it's no 
surprise that income from eBay selling is taxable," said Jamie Golombek, 
vice-president of tax at CIBC Wealth. "Sellers who may be in trouble 
should approach the taxman before they come after you."
John Wonfor, national director of tax for BDO Dunwoody LLP, said the CRA 
is concerned only with professional e-commerce practioners, not 
individuals who may infrequently sell items such as used sofas just to get 
rid of them, usually at a loss. "You don't have to pay tax on a loss and 
you can't deduct it because it's personal use property, so it's a non 
event."

There are five levels of PowerSellers, with the top ones transacting 
US$150,000 a month, Mr. Wonfor said. "So there's substantial stuff going 
on."

Once the CRA got the information it demanded on the PowerSellers, it would 
check income tax and GST returns to see if they matched eBay activity. If 
there is a mismatch, the agency would begin audits.

"They're putting everyone on notice that they should come forward before we
catch you," Mr. Wonfor said, "PowerSellers who have been reporting all along
have nothing to worry about."

Michael Rice, a semi-retired PowerSeller and owner of Fenian Antiques in 
Saanichton, B.C., says he gives the CRA an income statement every year and 
pays GST and provincial sales tax on all transactions. But there are many 
on eBay still not following the rules, he said: "They're trying to fly 
under the radar and will get caught at some point." CRA 

Now CRA can go after RODD and similar unlicenced seondhand dealers.
CRA will start with "arbitrary assessments".

People like RODD, with all their houses and cars will get especially 
hard hit by CRA, who can now force ISPs and websites,such as
kijiji, ebay, usededmonton.com, and even edmonton.forsale.

A while back the Edmonton newspapers featured a story from the Tax Department
concerning a Marvin Fine.

Like RODD, Fine had accumulated several houses and other assets, far in excess
of his declared income.

Like RODD he was caught in illegal activities.

CRA not only got him to pay hundreds of thousands in taxes and penalties, but
Fine also got a CRIMINAL SENTENCE OF TWO YEARS !

CRA wil be prosecuting RODD, and he will be forced to declare his criminal
income:
	was it from sale of stolen goods?
	was it from sales of illegal drugs?
	was it from homo prostitution?

In Canada, ALL income legal or not must be declared to the Tax authorities.
Since the Harpo government needs all the money they can get from Alberta, to
give to Toronto and Montreal, they are going to nail people like scofflaw RODD.

The URL listing some of his customers will provide CRA additional evidence for
criminal  prosecution of RODD.

When CRA do  an Arbitrary Assessment on RODD, which Sharx can explain, then RODD
will be joining other tax cheats in the pen.

He has even admitted to the scope of his dealings:

RodNSue - Second-Hand Computers- WARNING UNLICENCED SECONDHAND DEALER More 
Group: ab.general � Group Profile
Author: ErnstZundholzErnstZundholz
Date: Apr 9, 2007 07:33

Not only does David Poon exist, he reports to William Reich, Director, for the
Edmonton CRA office.

Glad to see that you are admitting to being an unlicenced second-hand dealer
of computers, flooding the newsgroups with all your secondhand computers
and parts.

Now the City Licence inspectors will be demanding money for operating
without a licence.

Then, the City Tax department will force you to get a rezoning, for operating
a second-hand business from the home.

And, you might even get fired from working at Dell, and selling their used
junk parts, in competition with their new crap, which is in contravention to
their terms of employment you signed.

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:52:31 GMT, "RodnSue" wrote:
>DAVID POON is a figment of your sad imagination, no such person exists at
>canada place dill hole, your such an old sienile man. A poor excuse for a
>human, you should be hung upside down on a tree, with a fork stuck in your
>ass. David Poon will then appear and smear yougurt all over your pulsating
>balls. No thats too good for ya....1 Bullet would do....
>David Poon can blow me, and lick my nutts, because he dont exists.
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>Now down to business, I have 23-Optiplex GX 270`s, 12-280`s and a bunch of
>Latitude`s to unload cheap, Just dont expect a warranty, because there as
>real as David Poon.

>"BenJKramer" roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote in message
>news:eaebo2lgjldcrag4dhg523ei2qj0tr880o@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:59:54 GMT, "Mike W." gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Hey dipshit...
>>>WHERE did Rodd ever say he bought this computer from his employer Dell ?
>> He admitted this several times in response to comments from another
>> poster, claiming he worked on Dell's 3rd floor.

>>>Even so ? QUOTE me the regulation, asshole.. SHOW me where it says I can't
>>>resell a purchased used computer without running a business for it ? Show
>>>me the regulation that says I can't sell a THOUSAND of them, so long as I am
>>>not doing it under a company name or charging any tax for it.
>> You need to read the Canada Income Tax Act, and also CRA Regulations.
>>>I am sure it's YOU the tax department is interested in, Bill. Probably
>>>CSIS and the RCMP too. Oh and by the way ? The CRA? BY LAW has to list all
>>>employees publicly. No David Poon listed anywhere. You imagined him. You
>>>know it... Now we all know it.
>> CRA does have an Insp. David Poon, whom you can reach at Canada Place.

>>>"DrErnstZundholz" roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:8k5kk2pqtpud3r9lapdd8rnbq46jrkcv8g@4ax.com...
>>>> On 1 Nov 2006 18:17:45 -0800, "Tangent" gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Buying and selling quantities of computers, purchased from the employer
>>>> DELL, at staff discount pricing, constitutes running a business under
>>>> CRA Regulations.
>>>> The tax department is very interested in the "underground economy" and
>>>> tax avoiders. Just ask Bax and the senior people of Edmonton Freenet for
>>>> example.
>>>>>> The person he named has never in his life ever been to Saskatchewan,
>>>>>> nor has had business dealings there either.
>>>>>> On the other hand, Inspector David Poon of S.I.-CRA will be
>>>>>> considering what to do about Rod and his unlicenced second-hand computers
>>>>>> business.

>>>>>> When the tax people visit Dell to verify how many computers you bought
>>>>>> and sold, do you still think that you will be working at Dell?
Re: CRA - Go Get Him + Collect All He Owes - Even Prison 4 Grosvenor = RODD
#4849
Author: Grosvenor = RODD
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:21
6 lines
1780 bytes
On Oct 31, 4:08 pm, Moldy Bread <MoldyBr...@redmonton.com> wrote:
> CRA - Go Get Him - Collect All He Owes - Even Prison 4 RODD?
> CRA Going After Ebay Sellers, and Similar Tax Swindlers


Grosvenor = RODD
Re: CRA - Go Get Him + Collect All He Owes - Even Prison 4 RODD the Dumb Scammer?
#4850
Author: Anne Onime = William Grosvenor
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 04:16
3 lines
1639 bytes

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.prettyboy/browse_thread/thread/28af3af442bbf085?hl=en#
http://William-Grosvenor.info He Owes - Even Prison 4 RODD the Dumb Scammer?
#4822
Author: Kenneth McVay OBC
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:01
98 lines
5590 bytes
In article <16qrc61mj1j6ai20c2609hsi8uh5qush2c@4ax.com>,
Moldy Bread  <MoldyBread@redmonton.com> wrote:

Oh, look! There's William Grosvenor's favorite
newsreader again!

Updated Grosvenor Legal Documents & Extortion conviction: 
http://William-Grosvenor.info

William Grosvenor is a convicted criminal who
devotes his time to spreading hatred and defamation.

Grosvenor recently complied with a court order to pay a 
$50,000 libel award and costs in excess of $30,000 
resulting from his penchant for defamation,
libel, assault and extortion.

He is, above all, monumentally stupid.

Grosvenor now lives in exile, a complete and monumental disgrace.

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html

Defamation

[52]      In Botiuk v. Toronto Free Press Publications
Ltd., 1995 CanLII 60 (S.C.C.), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 3
(S.C.C.), Cory J. said, at para. 62,

   [A] publication which tends to lower a person in the
estimation of right-thinking members of society, or to
expose a person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, is
defamatory and will attract liability.What is
defamatory may be determined from the ordinary meaning
of the published words themselves or from the
surrounding circumstances. 
                         
[53]      The tort of defamation consists of the two
torts of libel and slander.  The law of libel and
slander protects an individual.s reputation.  Libel is
any publication of defamatory material.  The law
presumes that the words are false unless and until the
defendant proves the contrary.  In order to succeed in
his defamatory action, the plaintiff must establish
each of the following three elements on a balance of
probabilities:  (1) the words are defamatory; (2) the
words are published; (3) the plaintiff is the person
defamed: Rainaldi, Remedies in Tort, looseleaf
(Carswell, 2006), at pp. 6-20.

[54]      With respect to the first element, the
Postings on the various websites and with the various
website groups are clearly defamatory according to
their ordinary meaning.  They are calculated to be
personally and professionally insulting and demeaning.
They refer to the plaintiff as a dishonest man, liar,
scumbag, pimp and disgusting maggot, to name a few.
They falsely allege that the plaintiff is part of
organized crime and financed by .mobs..  They falsely
allege that the plaintiff was convicted of child
molestation.  They attack the plaintiff.s credibility
and reputation as a lawyer.  They significantly
discredit his personal and professional reputation and
they do so over and over again.  They heap hatred,
contempt and ridicule on the plaintiff and by their
volume and wide dissemination, they seriously expose
the plaintiff to hatred, contempt and ridicule from
others.  As the plaintiff testified at trial, to be
falsely alleged to be a pedophile convicted of sexual
assault against a young person is particularly hurtful.

[55]      With respect to the second element, I have no
difficulty concluding that the defamatory words are
published.  The Internet is a means of publication like
no other, given its ability to instantaneously send
words throughout the world to the millions who have
access to computers.  The defendant has caused
defamatory words to be communicated to others by the
Postings and each time he has re-posted the same
defamatory words in the Postings, he has created a new
publishing of these words.

[56]      I also have no difficulty concluding that the
third element has been established, in that the
plaintiff was clearly the person being defamed.  The
defendant mentioned the plaintiff.s name in all of the
Fourteen Postings referred to above.  In some of the
Postings, the defendant included links to a picture of
the plaintiff.

[57]      It is for these reasons I conclude that the
defendant's Postings have defamed the plaintiff.

-- 
The Nizkor Project  -   An electronic Holocaust educational resource
    David Irving vrs. Deborah Lipstadt & Penguin Books Ltd: Judgment
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/judgment-00-00.html
      http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/i/irving.david/libel.suit
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads