🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: a.a.mis.talk
Article #930

Re: modem tests

#930
From: wagstr
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00
85 lines
3444 bytes
Dan,

I am within 700 feet of the remote, so I don't know if that makes a
difference or not.  I guess I should feel fortunate achieving regular
connects of 33.6, but I am downright jerked about it.  Modem manufacturers
should ethically and/or legally print those kinds of prominant issues on
their products in an effort to not mislead consumers.  Please forward to
Ralph Nader.

I am sitting on a Diamond Stealth Supraexpress ISP and can't do a thing with
it.  Kind of like owning a Corvette, while living in the Amazon?


Craig


At 09:12 AM 12/9/97 -0500, you wrote:
>If you are on a SLC, you will be lucky to get 28.8.  We mostly see 26.4
>and 24000's.
>
>--Dan
>
>On Tue, 9 Dec 1997 wagstr@gte.net wrote:
>
>> Joe,
>> 
>> You better call your local telephone company because if they have your
>> service being provisioned via a Slick 96 (SLC96) Concentrator you will NOT
>> achieve any connections higher than a 33.6.  I am speaking from experience.
>> Bell has my service being provided in that manner and the only way to
>> achieve the higher rate is to fork out the $ for ISDN, which I am not
>> willing to do.
>> 
>> The SLC96 is the most common problem for not being able to connect at speeds
>> in excees of +33.6 kbps and are it is the result of the local telephone
>> companies not upgrading their facilities to enable higher bandwidth
>> connections.  This is done to cheaply serve faster growing developments /
>> communities with digital switches that allow custom calling features.
>> 
>> Hope this helps.
>> 
>> Craig
>> 
>> 
>> At 01:08 AM 12/9/97 -0500, you wrote:
>> >On 12/10/97 I tried a few of the various modem options outlined in Tom
>> >Rusnocks note (12/8: New Numbers......). Here is what I found:
>> >
>> >Computer:    P233MMX
>> >Modem:        LT Win Modem (Lucent - K56flex)
>> >OS:                Windows 95
>> >Telco:            Commonwealth (788)
>> >
>> >Dialing 450-7480 (BELL 33.6): Connected at 28.8 (Multiple times)
>> >Dialing 501-9956 (CTCO 33.6): Connected at 31.2 (Multiple times)
>> >Dialing 501-9935 (CTCO 56k): Connected at 28.8 (Multiple times)
>> >Dialing 208-4876 (CTCO 56k): Connected at 28.8 (One attempt)
>> >
>> >I had been connecting to the 56k lines at 31.2-33.6 up until yesterday or
>> >today. I have never connected to the 56k line above 33.6. I will forward my
>> >modem log directly to Tom Rusnock and not bore everyone else with the
>> >gibberish. Hope this helps the cause.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>~..............................................................................
>--Daniel Ellis
> Director of Engineering / Chief Engineer, MicroServe Information Systems Inc.
> (717)821-5964
>
>		"The only way to predict the future is to invent it."
>                      --Alan Kay
>
>
>
>

-- 
About this listserv: http://home.microserve.net/listserv
    Acceptable Uses: http://www.naispa.org/aup
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19971209161808.0066b9b4@mail.gte.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fcaae,6c374e06c65d7300
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcaae,public
From: wagstr@gte.net
Subject: Re: modem tests
Date: 1997/12/09
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19971209161808.0066b9b4@mail.gte.net>
X-Deja-AN: 296632583
Distribution: world
Sender: server@mail.microserve.net
Organization: Microserve Information Systems : 1-800-380-INET
Reply-To: <mis-talk@microserve.net>
Newsgroups: a.a.mis.talk
Originator: mis-talk@microserve.net