Re: Junk Mail that is NOT junk

Article View: a2i.general

Article #686

#686

From: amatu
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 00:00

24 lines
1239 bytes

In article <35411E13.DB416DC8@brh.com>, BRH  <brh@brh.com> wrote:
>Ah, now I see what all the fuss is about.  If the reduction of
>spam depends on analysis of words within the body of the message,
>rather than just the words in the header, then we're talking
>about one-man censorship.

Please explain how it's "censorship" for YOU to have complete control
over what gets in your mailbox.

If you don't want the nojunk filter to score incoming mail based on
suspicious phrases that appear in the body, then set your nojunk level
to something less than 8.

>The man pages are probably clear on that.  

They certainly are.  Did you read them?

>Hmmm, and here I thought ALL professional writers weere against
>censorship.

I certainly am.  Your point?

-Alex

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6hsnet$3dd$1@samba.rahul.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <354014C1.7556397C@brh.com> <6hr023$ak6$1@samba.rahul.net> <35411E13.DB416DC8@brh.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111b8f,d05700347a8e201f
X-Google-Attributes: gid111b8f,public
From: amatu@unicorn.us.com
Subject: Re: Junk Mail that is NOT junk
Date: 1998/04/25
Message-ID: <6hsnet$3dd$1@samba.rahul.net>
X-Deja-AN: 347563611
References: <354014C1.7556397C@brh.com> <6hr023$ak6$1@samba.rahul.net> <35411E13.DB416DC8@brh.com>
Organization: a2i network
NNTP-Posting-User: unicorn
Newsgroups: a2i.general

Reply to Parent Message