🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <6hreqn$dkk$1@samba.rahul.net>,
William Wu  <ganesha@rahul.net> wrote:
>Jennie Van Heuit (peapod@nojunk.rahul.net) wrote:
>: Looks like Spam-o-matic to me. Probably not what you were
>: wondering. I wouldn't reply if I were you; a reply just
>: tells them it's a viable address.
>
>Actually, no reply might put you on the list.  Since the message didn't
>bounce it indicates unicorn@rahul.net is a valid e-mail address!

Yeah, I'm screwed either way.  Replying verifies me as deliverable, and
the lack of a bounce does the same thing.  Although the lack of a bounce
is less certain -- the sender won't know if the mail got silently
filtered and dropped at the other end.

I guess this is truly a case of "just delete it."  That's what I'll do.

-Alex