🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <6hsn3q$3cp$1@samba.rahul.net>,  <amatu@unicorn.us.com> wrote:
>Yeah, I'm screwed either way.  Replying verifies me as deliverable, and
>the lack of a bounce does the same thing.  Although the lack of a bounce
>is less certain -- the sender won't know if the mail got silently
>filtered and dropped at the other end.
 But in all likelihood they don't care - what they are most likely
building is a bounce-free spam list. Incidentally, I have seen a few of
these flying around, although I don't remember whether they hit my own
accounts or only read about them in NANA.

>I guess this is truly a case of "just delete it."  That's what I'll do.

 Note that you (instead of the mailder-demon) too can bounce mail either
manually or via procmail, which may be the best thing to do if you're
concerned about becoming a veryfied spammee.
 
-- 
 Zoli Fekete <http://www.eternal.net/Hungarian-FAQ_keeper>
 * BEWARE: I will never buy anything from companies associated with
 * inappropriate online advertising (unsolicited commercial email,
 * excessive multiposting etc.), and discourage others from doing so too!