Article View: a2i.info
Article #74Re: ad-filtering web proxy (experimental)
From: Michelle Dick
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 00:00
50 lines
3090 bytes
3090 bytes
In article <899602$69e$1@samba.rahul.net>, axlq.a2i.info <axlq@unicorn.us.com> wrote: >Thanks, Michelle, for the most fascinating article. One part I have a >quibble with: > >>Ad-filtering users are but a very small fraction of viewers. Should >>this change, expect that web advertising will go the way of print >>advertising, where the publisher is responsible for hosting the ad. >>If this happens, small websites will no longer be able to provide the >>auditing required by major advertisers (and currently provided by the >>media sellers) and will no longer be able to sell their sites >>effectively as they do now. > >What resources? If you're talking about money, banner ad management >software No, I'm talking about auditing, not ad-serving software. The advertiser is not going to trust the web publisher that they delivered 250,000 bona-fide graphic-delivered impressions that month, all from unique IPs within 1-hour slots (say) and not representing more than 7.5% of the site's available delivered impressions. A third-party trusted auditer is going to be required. Right now, the media sellers do this and because they host the ads, the cost is low (rolled into commissions). Having an auditor verify in-house statistics on impressions from some random host machine, running who-knows-what hacked software and verify that the impressions are legitimate and not auto-generated on a site-by-site basis is going to be much more expensive. Since, currently, media sellers host the ads, the stats are removed from control of the web publisher, thus establishing the validity of them in a cost effective manner. This issue is not as big a deal for pay-by-click advertising, but the online ad industry is moving heavily to pay-by-impression and for most publishers this represents 3 to 10 times as much income. There is much abuse in the pay-by-click ad arena, particularly with companies that use pay-by-click campaigns for pure branding purposes. As for ad software, it's cheap and installing is no more expensive than other aspects of publishing the website. Indeed, a large proportion of those who use media sellers also use ad software locally to rotate in banners from other sources. Actually, what may happen is that there will be trusted web-hosting ISPs who act as auditors for a charge and web publishers will have to move their sites to one of those ISPs to get cost effective auditing for in-house advertising. -- Michelle Dick artemis@rahul.net East Palo Alto, CA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<899d9r$7i6$1@samba.rahul.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<88jkn3$r9e$1@samba.rahul.net> <893clv$pej$1@samba.rahul.net> <896t80$i8g$1@samba.rahul.net> <899602$69e$1@samba.rahul.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1379c7,c9d2cbcb83c73d81 X-Google-Attributes: gid1379c7,public From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net> Subject: Re: ad-filtering web proxy (experimental) Date: 2000/02/26 Message-ID: <899d9r$7i6$1@samba.rahul.net> X-Deja-AN: 590426294 References: <88jkn3$r9e$1@samba.rahul.net> <893clv$pej$1@samba.rahul.net> <896t80$i8g$1@samba.rahul.net> <899602$69e$1@samba.rahul.net> Organization: a2i network NNTP-Posting-User: artemis Newsgroups: a2i.info