Re: You May Not Be Entitled to Your Spouse's Pension

Article View: ab.general.

Article #13

#13

From: RD
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:00

34 lines
2585 bytes


Gerry Carter wrote:

> RD <doduckr@cadvision.com> wrote in message
> > why should they ?  do wealthy people really beed $1300 more per month from
> > the government ?  im not saying they should be denied $1300 because they
> are
> > rich, only that it comes from the government and it could be used more
> > effectivly for people who need the money.  Wealthy people should not be
> > sucking money from the goverment.
> >
> > Robb
> >
>
> So you get to define what wealthy is, to decide how much to pick their
> pockets for, and you also get to decide that they have no right to ever get
> any of it back?  It does NOT come from the government, it comes from the
> taxpayer, and what I see defined as rich in many of these newsgroups is
> ridiculous.
>
> Receiving back a small percentage of what is paid in is NOT sucking money
> from the government.  It is having a thief return you enough money from your
> wallet to make your way home.
>
> Not hard to tell where your politics are.

where are my politics exactly ?

i have no idea how you define rich.  but i still dont see why a person who lives
in a multi million dollar house and then lives 6 months in Palm Springs, should
be elegible for a $1300 per month check from the taxpayers.

Robb

Technical Details

Message-ID: <37659095.57C891A0@cadvision.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<3760436a.26402410@news.cadvision.com> <37607B87.1C62@istar.ca> <37606249.34306379@news.cadvision.com> <3761415E.E0A78387@cadvision.com> <cAZ83.11852$Yr2.174042@news2.rdc1.on.home.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid109a5e,public
X-Google-Thread: 114774,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid114774,public
X-Google-Thread: fb374,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public
X-Google-Thread: fb626,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb626,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public
X-Google-Thread: 109f22,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f22,public
From: RD <doduckr@cadvision.com>
Subject: Re: You May Not Be Entitled to Your Spouse's Pension
Date: 1999/06/14
Message-ID: <37659095.57C891A0@cadvision.com>
X-Deja-AN: 489611960
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.50.1.43
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3760436a.26402410@news.cadvision.com> <37607B87.1C62@istar.ca> <37606249.34306379@news.cadvision.com> <3761415E.E0A78387@cadvision.com> <cAZ83.11852$Yr2.174042@news2.rdc1.on.home.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: 14 Jun 1999 16:31:09 -0700, 207.148.146.71
Organization: CADVision Development Corporation (http://www.cadvision.com/)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: ab.general.,ab.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.reform,calgary.general,can.legal,alt.philosophy.law

Reply to Parent Message