🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3528830f.0@skyview.icrossroads.com>, infpowtm@icrossroads.net (Patrick Lepine) wrote:
>In article <6g2jn2$hus$1@usenet49.supernews.com>, HiThere@outtatown.com
> (Hithere) wrote:
>
>>That is a problem for the public schools etc that supercedes the strict issue 
>>of homosexuality. I don't particularly like socialists or religious zealots 
>>teaching my children, either--but that is a problem of a collectivized and 
>>compulsory state-run school system. I agree with and support parental rights 
>>over the directives of the State. Let gay hockey coaches provide their 
>>services on the open market, and let those who _choose_ them for coach 
>>positions send _their_ kids. James was not wrong because he was gay; he was 
>>wrong because he was a sexual predator.
>>
>
>
>Compulsory state run school system?  You know of a province in Canada that 
>prohibits home schooling?
>

Sorry, I mispoke. Those who do not use the State system have to pay twice, but 
you are quite right. My point however, was that the problem described--that of 
having no control over the attributes of teachers is certainly more of an 
issue in the oublic school system.

Ron