🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <gall-0504981716560001@usrts2m3.uwinnipeg.ca>, gall@uwinnipeg.ca (Norman Gall) wrote:
>In article <6g7iuk$qv7$1@usenet51.supernews.com>, HiThere@outtatown.com
>(Hithere) wrote:
> 
>>  Your understanding of the issues is pretty shallow, and you know nothing of 
>> *all those* who oppose the decision. _I_ oppose the decision and I am
>not only 
>> bisexual, but the furthest damn thing from _any_ kind of collectivist/fascist
> 
>> you care to describe.
>
>> Laws based on the Vriend decision _are_ based _exactly_ on a desire of the 
>> *politically-correct* to control the actions of those with whom they
> disagree.
>
>You strawmanise his position in exactly the same way that you claim he has
>done to yours.
>
>Norm Gall
>

Cute, Norm--now _identify_ the strawman--and _why_ it is a strawman. Just 
exactly how is the Vriend decision _not_ an action based on a desire to 
control the actions of others?

Ron

Ron