🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <35255E53.28B44FDC@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>,
commodore-lars@geocities.com wrote:

> Norman Gall wrote:
> > commandr@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca () wrote:

> > > I would like to point this out.  When human rights are used as a defence
> > > to protect homosexuals from discrimination, I ask myself this question.
> > > What would people like Elena Bonner, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Natan
> > > Sharansky, and Wei Jingshen have to say about their human rights being
> > > deprived compared to the homosexual community in Canada.
> > 
> > I woudl htink that they would applaud and laud the decision. peraps you'd
> > better go and read the writings of some of these people
> 
> Um, apparently you didn't look carefully.  Their rights are being
> deprived by comparison.

More drivel.  Protecting homosexuals from the sort of discrimination we
are talking about affects *no one* except soem hateful or ignorant
people's sensibilities.  Too bad.

> > I would submit that the same could be said if Christians were objecting
> > that they were being fired from jobs and not hired on the groudns that
> > they were Christians.

> This can, does, and should happen.  If you don't want to hire a
> Christian secretary, you can do this.  

No you can't.  I've seen three successful petitions in Toronto alone.
You'd better do a little more research.

This *should* not happen.

> If you don't want to hire an
> asian secretary, you can't because it is physically immutable and beyond
> the individual's control.  If you don't want to hire a secretary because
> of her "Black Power" viewpoint, you are perfectly allowable to do so.

No, you aren't. I can't fire someone if he's a Reform party member.

> > > Thirdly, when a person makes a judgment, they are using prejudice.
> > 
> > Don't be a fool.
> 
> You are being quite the fool if you claim otherwise.

Whatever you say wastrel, but your schooling in the legal situation is
laughably 

> > > After all, homosexuality is a lifestyle, and lifestyles change.
> > 
> > So is religion.
> 
> Yes it is.  Point?

We can't do it on the grounds of religion either. Read the goddman Charter
and the arguments that were used to justify them.

> > Sure they do.  You simply don't know that they do.
> 
> Moral relativism, along with believing that 10% of the population is
> gay, is a farce.  Get over it.


Haven't a clue, have you?

-- 
" On an occasion of this kind it becomes more than a moral duty 
  to speak one's mind. It becomes a pleasure."      Oscar Wilde