🚀 go-pugleaf

Norman Gall wrote:
> commodore-lars@geocities.com wrote:

> > Gays already have individual rights.  Try again.
> 
> So do women, Muslims, and blacks.  They need their rights pointed out
> *explicitly* because of freaks like you.

This act doesn't explicity point out rights.  It holds behavioural
characteristics such as homosexuality or walking backwards in the same
stature as unalterable characteristics such as colour or gender.

> > > Well, interestingly enough, your wrong.
> > We all look forward to the proof.
> Take a look at any Marriage Act in any province or territory.

I didn't realize any of them were written by any creators.

> > Poor kids.
> have you even met the children of homosexual couples? No? Shaddap.

Do I need to?  Studies show that without BOTH a mother and father
figure, that child rearing suffers as a result.

Why should foster children be put in such unfortunate scenarios.

> > Really?  With these new "rights", trying to weed out pedophiles becomes
> > all the more difficult.
> Not at all. more scarmongering.

Tell that to the Scouts or Boys & Girls Club.  Or WORSE, tell it to the
parents of the poor kids who are molested because of this ruling.

> > And Trudeau's action in 1968 wasn't going to eventually lead to
> > homosexual rights either.
> False analogy.

That's what was used to dispel the critics of the legalization of
sodomy.  No, it wasn't going to lead to gay rights, it was just getting
the state out of the nation's bedrooms.

> > Pedophiles say so.
> No they don't.

Yes they do.  They affirm that their lifestyle is perfectly normal and
just one more orientation.  I know.  I've had the misfortune of
communicating with them.
 
> > None of those are behaviours.
> 
> Ok, how about people who drink beer?

Behaviour.  If you don't want your kids' babysitter to be a person who
drinks beer, you can do that.

>                                       People who drive cars rather than
> bikes? People who read novels? People who watch TV? People who wear
> sweaters?

Same, same, same, and same.  It is perfectly legal to discriminate
against anybody based upon these behaviours.

> > Yes, there are MORE heterosexual predators.  But homosexuals are 12
> > TIMES MORE LIKELY than heterosexuals to sexually molest children.
> Nice try.  Show the torturous reasoning that produces this abortion of a
> conclusion.
> > And the average homosexual pedophiles has 150 victims compared to 20 for
> > heterosexual pedophiles.  35% of all pedophiles are homosexuals, who
> > make up 3% of the population.
> Drivel.

I see.  First you want to see the torturous reasoning.  Then you refer
to drivel the fact that 3% of the population makes up 35% of our
pedophiles.

> > The slippery-slope has been in existence for 30 years...why will it stop
> > now?
>  You *are* an idiot, aren't you?

Apparently being an idiot merely means knowing the facts and learning
from history.
 
--
Lars Ormberg
(I don't know where Mr. T lives...stop phoning my home)    (___)
                                                           (o o)
- I'm a genuine, certified, dixie fried, full of    /-------\ /
          pride, 'til I die pure bred redneck!     / |     ||O
            					  *  ||,---||
mailto:larso@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca                     ^^    ^^
mailto:commodore-lars@geocities.com

The University of Lars  http://www.freeyellow.com/members2/larso/
"The Grateway"   http://www.ualberta.ca/~larso/polysci/grateway.htm
Lars Across the Globe Campain
                 http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Club/5847/

Drew:So who all goes to these conventions anyway?
Lewis:Well, most of them are Trekkies like us, but then there are
	a few Star Wars and Babylon 5 fans there too.
Oswald:Yeah, like that's real.
						"The Drew Carey Show"