Article View: ab.general
Article #27935Trying to take gun makers to court???
From: Troy Williams
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 00:00
62 lines
3394 bytes
3394 bytes
Another article from the www.usnews.com website. --begin-- Trying to take gun makers to court Their wares work just as intended--and often someone ends up dead. Will courts order gun makers to pay up? Maybe so. The Center to Prevent Handgun Violence says it poked "the first hole in the dike of the gun industry's invincibility" last spring when it won a $150,000 settlement from a Nevada pawnshop that sold a semiautomatic "assault pistol" to a man who later shot eight people to death in a San Francisco office building. The center is now aiding heirs of a 15-year-old Berkeley, Calif., boy who was shot and killed accidentally by a friend. A suit against makers of the Beretta handgun used in the shooting alleges that the design was defective because it did not include "smart" technology that would have prevented anyone but the owner from firing it. Beretta denies negligence. A frequent target of lawsuits is the Glock 9-mm semiautomatic pistol, which is popular among police officers. Critics say the lightweight firearm discharges too easily, endangering suspects as well as law enforcers and their families. Last May, the 3-year-old daughter of a Washington, D.C., police officer accidentally killed herself after climbing onto a coffee table and taking her father's Glock off a cabinet. At least 35 suits have been filed over injuries or deaths from the pistol; Glock denies wrongdoing but has settled a few cases on confidential terms. Street sales. Nineteen relatives of victims struck down by black-market guns are attempting, in a case in a Brooklyn federal court, to hold major firearms makers liable as a group. Among the plantiffs is Freddie Hamilton, whose 17-year-old son was killed on the street by a handgun. The suit contends that the industry fails to keep its products from falling into criminal hands. Judge Jack Weinstein, a veteran of cases involving products like Agent Orange and blasting caps, refused last spring to dismiss the case, suggesting that the industry may be linked to "a large-scale underground market." "Preposterous," say gun advocates like Richard Feldman of the American Shooting Sports Council. Ordering a manufacturer to pay if its gun is used in a crime long after a legal sale "defies fact, logic and the law," he asserts. That view may prevail, but not before gun makers are put through the legal wringer. BY TED GEST --end-- Troy You might be a redneck if... Your mom ever came out of the bathroom and said "Ya'll come look at this 'fore I flush it!" - Jeff Foxworthy BTW! For a faster and the higher chance of a response, reply in E-mail. My news server has a tendency to go down once every other week and I lose all the new messages that are coming in at that time.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32a05594.4179938@news.praxis.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb626,adb6df65bd5d72c4,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb626,public X-Google-Thread: 10004d,adb6df65bd5d72c4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10004d,public X-Google-Thread: 112f74,adb6df65bd5d72c4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid112f74,public From: troyw@praxis.net (Troy Williams) Subject: Trying to take gun makers to court??? Date: 1996/11/30 Message-ID: <32a05594.4179938@news.praxis.net> X-Deja-AN: 201588976 organization: Praxis Information Group reply-to: troyw@praxis.net newsgroups: ab.general,can.talk.guns,ab.politics