Article View: ab.general
Article #27936I thought this would be of interest to the gun debators.
From: Troy Williams
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 00:00
115 lines
6325 bytes
6325 bytes
Taken from the www.usnews.com website. --begin-- Can `smart' guns save many lives? The newest idea for gun control: `smart' pistols that can be fired only by their owners In Muskingum County, Ohio, Sheriff's Lt. Michael Lutz surprised a burglar breaking into a gas station and wound up dead from three gunshots to the face. In Fall River, Mass., Officer Thomas Giunta scuffled with a man in an apartment building and died of three shots to the chest. In Christiansburg, Va., Officer Terry Griffith was fatally shot once in the head while trying to catch a shoplifter. Each officer was shot with his own weapon, wrestled away by an assailant. The stories aren't unusual: From 1985 to 1994, 89 cops were slain with their own guns. What if guns were "smart" (or "personalized") enough to fire only for their rightful owners and a few other authorized users? That would probably save cops' lives and prevent other tragedies as well. Close to 500 children and adolescents are killed in firearms accidents each year, many with their parents' guns. Some 1,400 youngsters commit suicide with guns annually. Personalizing guns is also likely to help stanch the flow of firearms to criminals. Studies show that 40 percent to 70 percent of the guns used by felons are stolen, most from private homes. Thefts total some half-million guns a year. Smart guns would be less attractive targets, since most criminals could not easily put them to use. Inoperable. "Personalized handguns would be inoperable by the curious young child, the depressed teenager and the criminal who steals the gun from a home or disarms a law enforcement officer," says Stephen Teret of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research. For several years, Teret and a small band of public-health experts have looked into the smart-guns idea, with results that are shaping the next gun-control debate. In February, Sandia National Laboratories completed a study laying out law enforcement requirements for smart guns and evaluating options in technology. Firearms makers are developing prototypes. Plaintiffs are demanding that all guns be made smart (story, Page 38), and lawmakers in several cities and states are likely soon to propose laws requiring all guns sold within their boundaries to include smart technology. Fulton Arms Inc. and Colt's Manufacturing Co. are testing designs that go way beyond the low-tech devices like trigger locks used most recently to prevent unauthorized users from firing a gun. An early version of the Fulton SSR-6 revolver won top honors at the 1993 National Inventors Expo. In it, a magnetic encoder sends a signal from a ring worn by the owner to a decoder in the weapon. It can't fire unless the connection unlocks the trigger. According to Fulton's chief executive officer, Kenneth Pugh, the company hopes to mass produce the gun by next spring, primarily for homeowners who want a weapon for self-defense. The Colt's entry--a .40-caliber semiautomatic pistol--is intended primarily for police. Radio signals allow the weapon to recognize and respond to a transponder worn by the authorized user (graphic). The transponder's normal range is only a few inches, so the gun won't work for a stranger who snatches it. The weapon is designed to recognize up to 50 transponders, so other cops could fire the gun if necessary. Colt's officials say they've figured out a way to defeat jamming of the radio system, a frequent concern, but they won't say how. The smart system will hike the cost of a standard service pistol from $600 to $900. Colt's hopes to place 100 or so in cops' hands for testing within 15 months and put the guns on sale in late 1999. "We're very excited about this," says Doug Overbury, Colt's vice president for engineering, "and we're frothing at the mouth to move it to the next level." Police groups are guardedly optimistic, wondering how reliable the guns are. A model law. The politics of the smart-guns issue are also gathering momentum. Within weeks, the Johns Hopkins gun policy center will release a model law that states and localities could use to require personalized guns. The Model Handgun Safety Standard Act would create local commissions to establish specifications for smart guns that would have to be met within four years. Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke has already expressed interest. The model law is likely to result in proposed legislation early next year in traditionally liberal gun states like Massachusetts, Maryland and New Jersey. This week, Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger will hold a hearing on proposed rules requiring all handguns sold in the state to be equipped with childproofing features. While gun owners and manufacturers' groups say they support smart technology that would yield safer firearms, the model law makes them suspect that the real agenda of smart-gun backers may be a scheme to confiscate or ban guns. They also worry that the technology might create a false sense of security and reduce pressure for the kind of education and training that represent the keys to firearm safety. But advocates for the advance claim that some people will always act irresponsibly. And some are likely to be saved by a smarter gun. BY GORDON WITKIN --end-- Troy You might be a redneck if... Your mom ever came out of the bathroom and said "Ya'll come look at this 'fore I flush it!" - Jeff Foxworthy BTW! For a faster and the higher chance of a response, reply in E-mail. My news server has a tendency to go down once every other week and I lose all the new messages that are coming in at that time.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32a054c8.3975228@news.praxis.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10004d,a574f0ec5a859d8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10004d,public X-Google-Thread: fb626,a574f0ec5a859d8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb626,public X-Google-Thread: 112f74,a574f0ec5a859d8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid112f74,public From: troyw@praxis.net (Troy Williams) Subject: I thought this would be of interest to the gun debators. Date: 1996/11/30 Message-ID: <32a054c8.3975228@news.praxis.net> X-Deja-AN: 201597509 organization: Praxis Information Group reply-to: troyw@praxis.net newsgroups: ab.general,can.talk.guns,ab.politics