🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:24:26 -0600, "King & Associates Int'l"
<kai@5pillars.com> wrote:

>Deacon:

>The problem I find with quoting scientific studies regarding many topics is
>there are always conflicting studies no matter what the topic

Um, no there aren't. A good, careful, controlled study in any field
will (almost) always give reliable, consistent results. If not, then
you've possibly discovered something. (if only that your scientific
method and/or experiment is lacking)

Tell you what. I've got references to a lot of good scientific studies
that say magnetic insoles are snake oil. The only way you can claim
otherwise is to provide an equally rigorous scientific study that
indicates otherwise. Until then, I (and anyone else) is perfectly free
to call you a snake oil salesman. In fact, even if you came up with
good evidence that they worked, I'd still have permission to pass
judgement on them. In fact, I'd say it's my duty to do so, even if I
were in the minority.

Colin
(not deacon)